Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghost1
I guess my thoughts are that it should be allowed as long as it still receives votes
applying the racist approach is a gamble....if utilized to the correct degree as destroyer indicated it can be successful....if done in excess see cashius summer classic example
I feel like voting trends should determine acceptability
the idea that u wouldn't say something to someone in person is based on the environment you would be placing yourself in...........if the environment of nc gives safe haven to racism then the user is right in utilizing it in the same sense that if an in person environment were lets say.......a giant group of white people......the user would most certainly feel comfortable using racism....strength in numbers and consensus...and the same vice versa............find any single battle where a white guy isn't battling a black guy and doesn't immediately get called out for being white
as long as nc continues to accept racist perspectives and promote that type of environment based on voting trends I think it is perfectly acceptable
I personally don't think that it is something we should be promoting but I think concepts should live or die in the free market arena with regard to the environment that we establish in our community as the backdrop/
|
Was gonna post this basicallly but didn’t want to type it out
Thanks Bags
Yeah basically nothing should be allowed or not allowed it simply should be subject to consequences to your success
Like dull boy stated if we allow one thing that is extremely personally offensive and not another than it’s a slippery slope.