[Destroyer]

The "evidence" for Ioesus (no 'J' until 1527 AD) is the new testament. That is it. One 1st century document is the only known document and only one found so far. There is no independent secondary reference at all (the Josephus and Tacitus edits debunked). This is after 150 years of intense searching for 'bible' evidence. The new testament is directly traceable to one person, Saul of Tarsus/Paul the Apostle. The accounts from "other people" are stated to have been given to him. Interestingly, all are written in Hellenic Greek, not Hebrew, something that would be expected coming out of Judea. All historians of the Roman Empire agree there is no account of any Jewish superman rebellion. There are extensive accounts of the general Jewish rebellion against Rome and Roman occupation but no magic freedom activist, at all. Why is the lack of evidence more believable than the preponderance of evidence?
The only historians who are sold on jesus, the man, having existed are the super religious ones