i think it's pretty problematic that you equate black lives matters, feminism, rebellion, and inquiring about police protocol. but anyways.
#1 i know what IA is lol, so basically it's easy to get them involved but the lack of actual action taken is the result of the strength of the police union. good to know
#2 i'm referring to a situation where there is no gun obviously lol. think mentally ill man with butterknife, or homeless person having a bad day and bystander called. i understand if the person is holding a gun that you are not likely to be patient. but on the contrary i have seen situations with white men holding rifles from 50 ft away and police use every bit of tact possible to de escalate without a shot fired.
#3 so you definitely disagree with the south carolina cop that shot and killed unarmed walter scott in the back as he ran away. that is good to know.
#4 i'm talking about a woman calling the cops because a black woman is sleeping in a common room on campus. or another woman calling about 3 black people leaving their airbnb with luggage, assuming they were breaking into houses. or the woman that called security on a black man who was just walking his baby in a stroller on a boardwalk. or the woman that called the cops on a black real estate investor as he was inspecting a house. do you think these women should be reprimanded?
#5 you can go to youtube and search 'officer kicking suspect in head' and get hundreds of results. here is a compilation of 10(feel free to ignore the source, just watch the video)
https://www.themaven.net/pinacnews/p...GWj2MQ/?full=1
#6
#7 what i mean is what constitutes non-compliance according to your training? because i have seen people get taken down aggressively while cops yell STOP RESISTING and the suspect is doing nothing but laying on the ground getting beat up, moving as little as physically possible under the circumstance. what i mean is do you guys take into consideration that when you are being hit or tased that there are certain physical reactions that cannot be subdued if you are the person being attacked? or does compliance mean you have to resist any sort of movement despite what is being done to you? basically, it's hard to not resist an assault that you believe is unwarranted, at a physical reactionary level. but it is usually exactly what is used to justify a charge of resisting arrest. do you as an officer ever consider this?