Quote:
Originally Posted by Amen
So ATTACKING a boarder is peaceful?
|
define attacking bro. or post a video of it from the other day.
again, my stance is there was 40,000 people and i've heard at most that 9 of them had some sort of bullshit bootleg "weapon". people had tennis rackets to deflect tear gas cannisters. a man in a wheelchair had a sling in a rock. if they were ATTACKING wouldn't there be literally ANY injuries on the israeli side?
the high high majority were peaceful. i know there was a buffer zone between palestinians and the israeli border. i know people were getting shot from 600 yards away.
so how is it possible to define what 40,000 unarmed people 600 yards away from the border were doing as ATTACKING?
this the same shit as standing rock. media paints it as a bunch of wylie coyote's when 0 people were armed at the protests. one guy brings a rifle & points it at the cops and suddenly all 10,000 people are worthy of losing arms and being shot point blank with rubber bullets and being hosed down with water cannons in freezing temperatures.