[uh-oh]

The simple answer is it depends on the predefined view

If a view is explicitly wrong and can proven to be wrong, than of course the view on it changes. But we arent speaking in terms of personal belief like morality and such because thats more of an objective type of thing.

If you bring facts as to why something is wrong that suits your argument, but tje argument for the other side has facts that suit their own, no minds will change.

The main problem with discussions is the failure to acknowledge different viewpoints. People dont put the same amount of weight as others put into things. So when you come with your list of reasons why something is wrong, tjat wont tip the scales if they have a list of reasons for why they believe it is right.

Neither is correct one way or the other, or else there wouldnt be an actual debate. If theyre both open minded obviously

Like climate change for instance, you have people that don't believe humans are accelerating it. They are fools. There isnt the data to support that (that ive seen), but i can still disagree that we need to do anything about it, because its inevitable. So fuck it. You can view my point of view as wrong, but those same climate scientists agree we are past the point of reversing it. All we can do is slow it.

So if you agree with that you may think im wrong for saying fuck it. But im not objectively wrong