Greetings, gentlemen.
Interesting match up here. Two very different writing styles and I don't feel anyone clearly stood out from the other. But if there was one thing that I could take from both, I believe Ender's piece was more cohesive, safely written whereas Mr. J's approach was a bit more creative but could have been constructed better. I liked Ender presenting us with a subtle, straight forward piece about our President and some of the things that he has certainly brought out since becoming one. I mentioned earlier that his piece was "safely written" and what I mean is, he wasn't overly complex in presenting his idea and while it isn't the most creative of pieces you'll read, it's informative and I thought he did well in describing the many aspects of the President. Mr. J on the other hand, I felt he took the more creative approach, a hard, in your face type of story, as dictated by some of the lines like "the jig is up", "slimy bastard", "put you in your place". It's no doubt the flow in J's piece was cleaner and I did like his approach to the topic/image he chose and I wonder did he just fire shots at some of the other competitors in that last excerpt? BOOM. But the difference in this match for me is Ender had a much complete piece, whereas I felt J's piece started really coming together towards the end (starting from the "it's a memento line").
MVGT: Ender.
Good job gentlemen.
__________________
Vetwork, bitches.
|