View Single Post
Old 08-25-2016, 02:42 PM   #11
Blanco Bishop
Senior Member
 
Blanco Bishop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Cali
Posts: 1,460
Battle Record: 11-20



Rep Power: 4150485
Blanco Bishop has a brilliant futureBlanco Bishop has a brilliant futureBlanco Bishop has a brilliant futureBlanco Bishop has a brilliant futureBlanco Bishop has a brilliant futureBlanco Bishop has a brilliant futureBlanco Bishop has a brilliant futureBlanco Bishop has a brilliant futureBlanco Bishop has a brilliant futureBlanco Bishop has a brilliant futureBlanco Bishop has a brilliant future
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sraL View Post
Okay @Blanco Bishop i'm about to play devils advocate in this thread a little since you indulged...

In what way is it not "plausible"?

I could argue that we do, already, select for beauty in our mating partners. And we do select for intelligence. Now, I may or may not be defining beauty as inner beauty, or emotional suitability as a spouse. I may or may not be defining intelligence as "gaming the system", for example people like Kim Kardashian do know how to earn a very good living, without building rockets or curing cancer in the garage. But the human race has pretty much been getting just what it wants, one baby step a generation, just like all other sexually reproducing species.

This is happening via natural selection, all around us, right now and has been for years.

Are we not already "selectively" breeding in a sense?

That's why I mentioned Darwinism bro.
Blanco Bishop is offline   Reply With Quote