View Single Post
Old 08-25-2016, 01:17 PM   #22
sral
LARSLARSLARSLARSLARS
 
sral's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: CRUMPETVILLE
Posts: 8,605
Battle Record: 28-3


Champed
- Gimmick Battle League
- The Winter Topical
- Topical Martyrs
- Lime Green Poetry Association
- Lyric Olympics
- Art of Writing League
- Guerrilla Writing League (2x)
- Black August II

Rep Power: 85899396
sral has a reputation beyond reputesral has a reputation beyond reputesral has a reputation beyond reputesral has a reputation beyond reputesral has a reputation beyond reputesral has a reputation beyond reputesral has a reputation beyond reputesral has a reputation beyond reputesral has a reputation beyond reputesral has a reputation beyond reputesral has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Okay @Blanco Bishop i'm about to play devils advocate in this thread a little since you indulged...

In what way is it not "plausible"?

I could argue that we do, already, select for beauty in our mating partners. And we do select for intelligence. Now, I may or may not be defining beauty as inner beauty, or emotional suitability as a spouse. I may or may not be defining intelligence as "gaming the system", for example people like Kim Kardashian do know how to earn a very good living, without building rockets or curing cancer in the garage. But the human race has pretty much been getting just what it wants, one baby step a generation, just like all other sexually reproducing species.

This is happening via natural selection, all around us, right now and has been for years.

Are we not already "selectively" breeding in a sense?
__________________
- Netcees Rebuttal Tourney
- Art of Writing League (x 4)
- AOWL Season 11 Champion (Undefeated Season)
sral is offline   Reply With Quote