Quote:
Originally Posted by quaker oats
@ veritas your dedication to mischaracterizing arguments is strong here, and I commend you for it. The way you "summed up" my argument is so wildly off-base that you're either that dumb or that committed to the corner you've backed yourself into. The ego is strong.
I didn't mistake the premise, just pointed out that you saying the police would "one day become militarized" is dumb because it already has. And yes, the military and police should play different roles. You're playing a basic "all or nothing" rhetorical game here, which is why 90% of your responses are questions that completely misrepresent the arguments you're quoting. Or, if I were you, I'd just say:
Sooooooo, racism doesn't exist right? Soooooo police officers are incapable of wrong now? Sooooo what you're saying is nothing in life could possibly interconnected with other things, fair?
Notice how I sounded authoritative while simultaneously completely missing the point at all levels? Trust that your schtick is noted and you're fooling no one. Do pray for yourself, V. I fear you have been consumed by your desires. This country needs people like you to change. Arise from the ashes of your former self and exceed the limitations of your narrow worldview. Fair? |
Lol wut? That convoluted discourse I would expect from destroyer but not you. Your argument about my argument is not only wrong but far from the point I am making.
No duh that the police is already militarized. These events keep that process moving forward and thus these events fuel the agenda. Read my first posts silly. Don't talk to me about ego when your mind has been consumed with trying to bend my intellect to your will by accusing me of not making a point I already made. Silly.