[Adonis]

2K - This concept never fully developed, but it was close as could be with out going full circle. I liked the read in all honesty. You held more focus than usual and were able to build around a certain idea even if the construction was incomplete. One of the better, more poetical reads I can remember from you since, shit, ever man. Good read.

Buddha - a little homage can go a long way. The read was cool, but, you writing shorter length really takes away your strengths. I assume you sort of just breezed through writing this, but in all honesty, this is a tough vote for me. I won't say you had any errors, but you simply weren't able, or didn't have the real estate really, to fully develop those individual line or bar or paragraph concepts that is you in a nutshell. The read was not bad, and although there was little in much of error, the read did come off as a bit lackluster.



V/ Each writer had a decent approach, and while GC had the better execution, I really really loved the angle 2K went for. He played the topic well, while executing at a good enough level to match his counter part. So, in the end, my vote came down to who had a singular aspect in which I vote with, better, Ie concept, flow, content etc. With that said, 2K had a good enough angle to narrowly nudge my vote



V/ 2K