Quote:
Originally Posted by uh-oh
speaking as someone who makes 20k a year, an extra 5k isnt extending my life and i plan on clocking out from lung/liver/prostate cancer at 66. literally the extra 5k would only change the house/apartment i rent, and the car i own maybe.
so i just want to say wittys reasoning is inherently false.
also magic johnson.
i've been saying on here hiv/aids aint shit anymore. its literally just a weak immune system. if you have money you basically have an immune system. you will live a normal life.
the end.
|
Here you wouldn't need to have money at all so it is taken out of the equation in terms of healthcare :) My reasoning is based on the fact someone making that salary will be more grounded, more responsibilities, and the average 29 year old person will have a family, thus things to spend money on other than himself/drugs/alcohol. A rich man can both do those things and spend insane money on partying every day...a lifestyle the first man simply can not afford. The first man could die the same way as the second man, but it would take much longer.