Obviously, Nigma had the stronger rhyming. Lars went with the narrative, which usually forsakes rhyming for the passage of the story. I do think this week's topics basically were suited best for stories. I mean the entire topic is presented as a what if, essentially.
Albeit, Nigma, went for the more bold approach which is abstract to something that intrinsically calls for a progressive movement to continue elucidating the events in the quote. I do believe while a nice presentation, there was a lot of flash and not all of clarity. There were many themes, which basically happen in the mind as it declines and then rearranges itself based on perspective. Almost like a tale of depression being lifted.
Lars had a straightforward story, as he usually does. Albeit, it was a little bit too straightforward, which I do feel sometimes is the weakness and strength of you. But, sometimes you go for something completely out the box and you still maintain this simplicity while talking about something very vast. Those verses are when your skills truly show. Here, your mechanics were displayed, although there was nothing that was overly stunning, yet you managed to shine in clarity, which in this week I felt was very important, especially because of the nature of the topics.
Vote: Clutbuck
|