I explained why I said "abolished" and also explained how "fulfilled" is the term Christians use, at the exact same time you posted the nitpick rebuttal. I've mentioned several theological points that support what I'm saying, you chose to hone in on a single changing of a word to hinge your argument on.
I never said Jesus would be pro-gay marriage. I said if he was on earth right now, he wouldn't spend his time campaigning against it, he'd be doing real evangelical work and preaching love - like he did according to the Bible. So far, that hasn't been remotely close to getting refuted, only mischaracterized and straw-man'd like crazy.
__________________
You should be water
|