[mayniuhh]

I'm gonna vote ok. I have no hate in my heart.


First q: is the image a photograph or was it the result of apply pigment(s) to canvas?

Photograph, non multimedia far as I see.

2q: Is the content of the image arranged in a manner specific to known art movements?

Far as I see, since black and white is not an art style per se, this is some manner of realist photography concerning itself with capturing movement, which, again is not a style per se. This may not even be artistic photography.

3q: what does the image consist of?

The subject is one of two grown, saddled, riden horses. The horses are mid-stride along what I would conclude to be a beach's edge. Shallow water sprays about, further emphasizing a credible sense of frozen motion. Shadows, the connected water body, the bottom 2/3 of a rider's side profile, and the hind of another runner complete this piece.

Q4: as a writer tasked with pulling from this image all possible harvests, what would rest upon my table?

A darkened foreground of shallow water, a streak of ocean spray effectively serving as a nice horizon line (that was where I got stuck on "am I sure this is an art photo?"), roughly 6500 streaks of water interacting with light in a manner that ultimately gives it whiteness, a black and white filter, 6 horse limbs, 1 human leg, 7 legs, horse saddle n harness, landscape view, an effectively grey background of deeper and settled waters.

Of course I missed a few things.

Now that we are on a similar insofar as what prompted or inspired these images, I will now look at each drop.|

phone died, will finish later.