Quote:
Originally Posted by uh-oh
you think mccown, mariota or winston is better than bradford?
|
McCown? No.
I don't know what Mariota or Winston will be in the NFL. I kind of buy the hype with Winston, and tend to think Mariota will be a bust. But they have potential. Bradford is an injury-prone quarterback who's below average when on the field. His downfield throwing numbers are some of the worst in the league. There's an article about it I could dig up. The advanced stats hate him. He doesn't pass the eye test; I've never watched Sam Bradford play football and thought he was a difference maker at all. His absolute ceiling is an average quarterback (although in Chip Kelly's system I could see him having some good years) whereas you can at least envision Winston or Mariota being franchise level quarterbacks if you're sipping the Kool-Aid. We know what Bradford is. I'd much rather have Winston, and would probably take Mariota over him too.