I had written a full exposition, but it got lost, so this one will have to straight to the point. Pardon me...
Deadman, your style is very uniquely yours. You rarely seem to tackle things directly. But prefer a more encompassing effect on the reader by offering a handful of images that one has to put together at the end, and see how they all come together. Not to say you do not use direct connotative effect to render a semblance of close parallel to the topic. Yet, even when doing so the words become drenched in a more ethereal feel, that although palpable, are eminently not to be grasped simply by the sagacity of the reader. But by the experience of the reader, experience of life that is. Experience in the observational aspect of the world.
NYC, I will be honest, and say you are one of my favorite reads. You have a very mature style with wording that is very elegant, yet still very approachable I find. You thrive on the exuding of narrative, and literary forms of composition. Your way of utilizing the English language does this a good credence. I will say though, that sometimes due to the maturity of your writing there is a bit pf psycho sclerotic concretion on the vessel which contains your perceptual torrent. The stream of consciousness that has developed through interacting, and developing a certain style. While, I'm not ostracizing stylistic comfort, I am stating that one can observe the whole horizon, as one stands keenly upon one's pagoda built upon the layers of tools one has developed. One can use their tools to observe a whole plethora of various interpretations. Which will mean expanding one's viewpoint which naturally defies instinct, which has come about from one's likes and dislikes. The reason I think this is relevant is because I can feel this block that prevents you from reaching pass the limits of the sky as you write. Anyways, i've rambled.
My vote goes to: NYC
Thank you both, lovely read.
|