[Ghost1]

Its funny cuz


...

Initially i had planned on posting......idk wtf ur even talkin about literally

But then i read the end.....and i understand what this piece is....and the metaphor

And it made me appreciate it

But then i wondered......he mustve purposefully stupified the ending if thats the only thing i was able to grasp. For me i was glad. Tho then i think.....why not simplify the whole verse.....and say no.....he doesnt want to do that. Annnd finally i arrive at.....if he doesnt want to simplify his material.....why sacrifice the integrity of the piece only at the end ...ur conflicted. U want to be absurdly complex and cater to the more politically informed demographic but not to the point that ur more less complex narrative metaphor is lost on the audience as a whole.

Idk wat to tell u. I think weve actually talked briefly on this.

For me.........as the uninformed .....it does little for me when u cater towards me only briefly in a piece that was never meant for me to favor regardless. I still have no fucking clue wat 75% of this shit was even referencing.....i feel like ur overall concept in retrospect did outweigh the references....but the bulk of the verse is references that surely give the piece its charisma. For me im not getting that pinache....its lost on me and i only get the skeleton of this piece to resonate on.

Food for thought i suppose. Imo go one way or the other........by attempting to broaden ur viewership by compromising ur style ur cheating both groups. Dont get me wrong i think u can blend ur style with a less complex approach....but this was not blended well.

Mechanics were great if u care?

Cool piece....it would seem from others comments.