View Single Post
Old 05-08-2014, 08:27 PM   #13
namix
been that, done there.
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,259
Battle Record: 2-1

Accomplishments
- OM HOF


Rep Power: 85246655
namix has a brilliant futurenamix has a brilliant futurenamix has a brilliant futurenamix has a brilliant futurenamix has a brilliant futurenamix has a brilliant futurenamix has a brilliant futurenamix has a brilliant futurenamix has a brilliant futurenamix has a brilliant futurenamix has a brilliant future
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by uh-oh View Post
i dont know if watkins will be there, but i agree clevelands best bet is to get watkins if available and a qb with there second first rounder

then if they grabbed hyde too their offense is nasty and troublesome

even if all they got is hoyer and a flop rookie qb, that many weapons would be ridiculous for anyone

realistically i see them getting the best available player, be it watkins or maybe even a tackle at number 4. and probably bridgewater later

either way i know it will be an utter failure because they are the browns.

but word im hype too. im a ne ohio blasphemer obviously, been rocking with the ravens forever, it is known

my team is in the position where they don't need to reach for anything. i'd like to see them get ha-ha or calvin pryor. or a good tackle or guard.

but they can realistically be flexible with everyone of there picks, its a deeeeep draft and there are no truly glaring needs

strong assessment even though you break my heart as you already know lol.


but yea, I would think you guys could use a bit of o-line support...having lost The Blind Side and all (half joking)... never the sexy pick, but that's how perennial good teams pick, so word up lol - you guys are good with some smart spot filling. probably a decent WR to complement Smith (both of 'em, the old and the young lol) and a mid-round RB to backfill rice


and while "i" still do not believe in Flacco, I also realize I am in no position to cast stones lol
__________________
well fed.
namix is offline   Reply With Quote