[uh-oh]

im trying to understand

i am letting you see things as i understand them. i am looking for you to say things as you understand them so i can compare our viewpoints.

my main problem is you say read the king james bible, but i find flaws in the fact that men decided what to put in that bible, and what to keep out, when none of it at the time, was more important than any of the rest

they just wanted an official version for all of the branches to follow in there far flung nations. alexandria practiced a slightly different form, than jerusalem, than rome, than byzantium, etc. i think it was constantine who made christianity legal, and had bibles made, which are the same bibles christians use today, with the old testament, and the new testament, with the gospels of the new testament that the council of nicaea CHOSE to include.

that is a flaw to me, i am asking how you personally overlook this, you must know something i don't, or there is a flaw in how i am taking in the info i am spewing

poke holes in it for me.