A bit of a conceptual difference, I did not enjoy the almost constant stream of username references, it came across as gimmicky and uninspired. It does respond to the topic, albeit tangentially, it's a tongue in cheek attack of the different members, pointing out flaws. It might have been more effective without the @ signs, Frankly and Certainly, wasn't effective, very minimal homophone puns. Timeless stood out in comparison with a warped biographical writing, would have preferred a standard biography, but the image of a clean-cut politician brandishing a gun had a sort of absurd humor that is appealing. The last section was the weakest, switching out from the narrative view to a narration view was less interesting than a crazy ending for the press conference that it seemed to be building up to. Voting timeless.
|