I mean from an unbiased 3rd party it looked like
-legitimate concern presented in an alarmist manner
-possible, difficult to disprove explanation
-Gradual yet very apparent self-implosion of initial concern
-Attempted calming of situation
-Head exploding anger at defendant who remained calm
I would call the thread a backfire unless Lars' post on RM is a complete and utterly explosive backfire of its own
|