View Single Post
Old 02-18-2014, 07:24 AM   #61
Ghost1
Senior Member
 
Ghost1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 26,334
Battle Record: 0-1



Rep Power: 84181445
Ghost1 has a brilliant futureGhost1 has a brilliant futureGhost1 has a brilliant futureGhost1 has a brilliant futureGhost1 has a brilliant futureGhost1 has a brilliant futureGhost1 has a brilliant futureGhost1 has a brilliant futureGhost1 has a brilliant futureGhost1 has a brilliant futureGhost1 has a brilliant future
Default

Lmfao. I forgot zygote.develped a full proof gamble screening process


Quote:
Originally Posted by ZYG View Post
An old one below but it was not given consideration on netcees.com as a viable tool at the time, in fact laughed off as a joke. Still believe OGST is fool proof in every way. OGST results are completely serious, at least 100% accurate and can easy solve this Lotto-Homie quandary.

The Objective Gamble Screening Test (OGST) (2012).

New users - Indicate for each statement: 1 = DISAGREE. OR 2 = AGREE.

1. I don’t worry about the possibility of being caught lying.
2. People would describe me as combative – I always win arguments.
3. I don’t cheat because it’s inherently unfair to others.
4. I enjoy manipulating the feelings of others.
5. I will often say whatever comes into my mind without thinking first.
6. I wouldn’t like to be famous/have a lot of attention.
7. I have arguments only because others don't understand/appreciate me.


Administration Section.
Mark each statement YES or NO for the new user’s OGST.
1. Presence of numbers, symbols or deliberate incorrect spelling within username. E.g., Retali8, 8offHitlah, $eizure, Phyre King, Young Moneyz etc.
2. User has unique font type. E.g., ALL CAPS (not sarcastic caps), colored font, bold or underlined etc.
3. User is over-aggressive and over-defensive without being provoked.
4. Discusses fetishes openly and regularly. E.g., Transsexualism, “heat from within” etc.
5. Frequent unfounded claims to be a famous TEXTCEE/AUDIO head.



MARKING INSTRUCTIONS.
Self-Report: Presence of 6 or more statements with AGREE indicate gamble-like symptoms.
Note: statements 3 and 6 are reversed – for these statements DISAGREE = AGREE (and vice versa).

Administration Section: 5 YES marks = Strong gamble.
3-4 YES marks = Several indications of gamble-like symptoms.
1 or 2 YES marks = Requires further investigation – treat with suspicion.
0 YES marks = Not gamble.

UPDATE: Txt development teams are currently working around the clock on the Scott Akers Detection And Screening Scale (SADASS) (2013).
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMS View Post
My dad once had like 4 beers at a family reunion, and drove us home better than my mom usually drives.
Not saying being drunk doesn’t mess up you reasoning. I’m turning 20 soon so I haven’t had a drink ever.
Ghost1 is offline   Reply With Quote