Quote:
Originally Posted by Seyance
you rhymed 'for' four times.. ironically, not sure why. flow wasn't all that bad just the rhymes were lacking any sort of complexity and vocab. decent message behind it all and that was the most cohesive part of it.
|
word, back in the beginning i wanted to use a lot of vocab. it's great when its on paper, but doesn't always translate very well over to a song. keeping it simple allowed me to be more freeflowing over the beat.
complexity makes people think, and sometimes i want listeners to hear some easily understandable shit. thanks for peeping and commenting sey, i appreciate it brother!