Quote:
Originally Posted by Witty
I don't know anything about this topic
|
well...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Witty
he said he fights in a way people who know about the technical aspect can enjoy, he didn't even come close to saying "if you don't like this guy you don't appreciate the technical aspect"...they are two very different things.
|
...no. because the subtext is defined by an extremely common argument about Georges and similar (negating) fighters who polarize fans.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Witty
Educate yourself.
|
try it?
for me, GSP was a supremely talented martial artist who lost his nuts, for a long time, after the Serra fight. i'll admit he showed some heart and steel in both the Condit and Hendricks fights, though. which is a shame because all it really does is hint at the true potential he had as a fighter, and didn't realise. let's be honest. he only stopped two guys in his WW reign post-Serra knocking him senseless, and while both were former champs, both were really LWs. he was capable of a LOT more
-- not tentaively jabbing or laying his way to wins for a half hour.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vulgar
Why not Fyodor?
|
Igor Vovchanchyn was his father.