Quote:
Originally Posted by dull boy
So media coverage defines legitimacy in this thread of what big is, war wise.
'World war' was a cute name. At the time, it helped describe the situation. Times have changed. We're living by rules made in the middle and latter parts of the previous century. Not living by them, but thinking in terms of how people viewed war and countries. There is a world economy now. Money is religion. World domination is attainable. I think eventually someone will have the balls to try and take it by force. America has been manipulating global control for a long time. They've done it under the radar, though, and under a guise created for it by a semi righteous history. Now things are more out in the open. There aren't many secrets. Gloves are being removed. Soon, I think, someone will push the button.
Sure hope the Saints win their division and get homefield advantage in the playoffs!
|
To your first point...yeah it kinda does, you seem to think I am suggesting that brings legitimacy to the war, but that is you taking meaning from my words which was not there, I meant the next war that people will be talking about, that media will be focusing on, there was nothing political about what I said, and plainly the war in Iraq was the biggest of recent times...the one people actually gave a shit about, right or wrong..