12-02-2013, 03:18 PM
|
#60
|
Saul Paul
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: remote location with a remote weapon station
Posts: 6,398
Battle Record: 16-26
Rep Power: 1663351
|
he speaks....
Quote:
Originally Posted by uh-oh
word
i know that it is actually very uncommon for a singular star system. but uncommon doesnt mean it doesn't happen. if we had a companion star it could not be covered up because of the thousands of amateur astronomers and others watching and looking at the skies. i understand it could be hidden to the naked eye, but we would be able to "spot" it from looking at any other planetary object. our orbits are defined, there is no hidden companion star effecting our or any other orbit, its all mathematics
ask yourself why pluto was demoted, we were looking for a 10th planet fucking with Jupiter and found pluto, but pluto didn't have enough mass. It's all mathematical like you said
our orbits are mathematically defined around the singular star, the sun. you can't dispute the math.
you're absolutely correct, we abide by the laws of our own system set forth by our sun. When another system with it's own set of laws comes in there is a compromise when factoring in interactions is it not? Just look at the Sun and how it interacted with Ison, it got more agitated as Ison drew closer, resulting in 2 X Flares being sent in it's direction on it's way to the sun. That's just one example, remember we're actually setting the record for the lowest activity ever during a solar maximum
please show me evidence of nibiru/planet x prior to sitchin
look it up, I've done all that stuff too much and am tired frankly.
im going to look up this 1983 stuff, because i am ignorant to it.
admitting ignorance is always healthy, but in your case you're not ignorant to it, just being made aware of it, nothing ignorant about that
|
__________________
KNOW YOUR MAKER BEFORE YOU'RE MADE TO
I know the ledge, his sister's a jumpoff
|
|
|