Quote:
Originally Posted by oXus
all projection of ego is merely an elaborate, perhaps subconscious, ruse to exhibit carnal desires. aspersions cast on sexuality are, in reality, omissions of curiosity; particularly toward strangers, on the internet, as the sense of anonymity often evokes a vague fetishism. correcting grammar is a fruitless exercise, and definitions tend to be the last resort of the scoundrel, but some of us - the pedagogues, and pedants - appreciate the deconstruction of unsavoury characters who insist on spelling incorrectly and being stilted malaprops, either in prose or verse. and then receiving the choice insult 'faggot', as auditors, means they want to eat our brain food, maybe more. it's simple science. you know who you are, the victims... the aggressors.
i'm just being glib tbh. i like the word coitus, though.
|
I question the underlying integrity of this and your following posts. Among the plethora, and subsequent indulgence of debauchery and manifestations of primitive acrimony here, a showcase of syntactical precision is indeed sporadic and isn't leading the least of us to an ebullient state. Nonetheless, I ratify your futile attempt to enlighten and/or bemuse us with your linguistic gymnastics. A continuation of this, however, would classify such an activity as a boondoggle worthy of exile, along with the ignominy of it's guaranteed failure.
Ego is just a cleverly disguised circumstantial wile used by the feeble man to lure credulous prey to a union of the former's intended instantiations of fantastical inclined neuron activity, of which may or may not be physical.
Survival of the wittiest. Scratch the tirade. Punchlines only. A lackadaisical spirit is one that endures the faux pas. Display a loutish, cavalier attitude - check.