Quote:
Originally Posted by Chyeahhh Guevara
elaborate Split
|
Well, most of his theories revolve around an idea that the sun's solar wind is positively charged particles... he believes this because the sun emits large streamers of positively charged particles into space
But this just means it is ionized.
There are loads (loads) of experiments done on the solar wind in space that show that it is ionized, not charged.
If the sun
emits positive charge, a negative charge would have to collect on its surface... this negative charge on the surface would result in a completely different model for the sun's magnetic field and the movement on the sun's surface that we see/ measure with different imaging techniques etc.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jim McCanney's website
On September 24, 2012 the official announcement of a new comet discovery of comet C/2012 S1 (ISON) showed this comet, that is currently beyond the orbit of Jupiter, would spend the next 13 months moving towards a near miss of the Sun in November of 2013. The current orbital calculations indicate it will come to within 2 million kilometers of the Sun (about 8 times the distance from earth to our moon) and then if it survives this passage will pass around to about half the distance between earth and the sun. Concurrent with this announcement the gov disinfo crew as well as the gov paid apologists are out in full force to perform damage control and protect their sacred "dirty snowball comet model". A comet like this could really bring attention to the public about how absurd their theory is not to mention the ongoing efforts to divert attention from the fact that an alternative and accurate comet theory has existed for over 30 years. I developed this theory in the midst of the top space science and astronomy department in the world at Cornell University. They have successfully kept the press at bay over all these decades. But few have faith in the government and their hired scientists who continue to pawn off garbage science on the public. Follow the following link and return frequently for updates on this comet that could provide the definitive visual evidence to the public that my comet theory ... The Plasma Discharge Comet Model ... is correct and always was the correct theory. This will set an entire precedent to start the dominos of traditional astronomical theory falling. jim mccanney
|
....essentially, McCanney hangs onto this assumption because it is the basis for the rest of his work- disproving the snowy dustball comet model or w/e
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by one of his abstracts
Primary results concerning the discharge of the solar capacitor included the following:
electrons, due to their higher mobility, are the primary charge carriers in a discharge
these are collected by the asteroidal obstruction, causing a build-up of negative charge on the comet nucleus
positively ionized atoms, molecules and dust particles form the plasma tail and are attracted towards the comet nucleus. They are not melting away as specified in the ice ball comet model
the comet tail shape is formed as ions and dust particles stream into the comet nucleus, following the electric field lines of the negatively charged sun and comet nucleus. The myriad of effects observable in comets are readily explained in terms of this model.
Once the physics of the solar capacitor and its discharge were understood, a limitation to further understanding and theoretical work was the lack of close range information on:
the extent of the local electrical field of the comet nucleus
the current levels which are passed in the cometary discharge
the dynamics of electron flow around the nucleus, etc.
|
"my theory explains everything. except my theory does not explain everything"
the dynamics of the tail formation rely on the comet passing through a charged medium, which space is not...
he's clinging to a variation on the "aether" model of space, most likely due to bitterness from being discredited by his former peers at Cornell... I actually feel for the guy.
anyways, on top of all that, he has some really outrageously dumb views on comet size/ gaining mass that only exist to create symmetry in his web of inaccuracy.
like, he believes that comets gain mass by collecting dust as they travel through space at 30-45 km/s
and that they are incrementally growing all the time.
but when you have a collision, there is energy transfer.
the number of collisions grows exponentially as the comet grows due to increased surface area
this means HUUUUUUUUGE amounts of energy are being transferred into the comet
and he still believes that the comet is growing indefinitely during all this
well, if you work out the math,
the comet would essentially have to be absorbing energy equal to 2,500 TRILLION NAGASAKI BOMBS EXPLODING ON ITS SURFACE EVERY SINGLE SECOND
Okay. Now, let us assume that Nbiru is the size of our moon.
it is hurtling Chyeahhh. hurtling. towards the earth.
this object being, as McCanney describes it, a hot, dense mass of rock, has a certain gravitational binding energy. Or an energy that must be overcome to tear it apart.
So, using numbers from before, the energy required to vaporize a comet of the Moon's mass would be about 10^36ergs, or one-hundredth the heat released by the impacts.
The heat caused by McCanney's "mass gain" is actually enough to destroy the comet itself.
it's a huge house of cards, Chyeahhhh