View Single Post
Old 10-01-2013, 05:50 PM   #101
uh-oh
DA GOD
 
uh-oh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Canton Ohio
Posts: 12,362
Battle Record: 1-0


Champed
- Beat Battle II
- Beat Battle V
- Beat Bags

Rep Power: 84181420
uh-oh has a brilliant futureuh-oh has a brilliant futureuh-oh has a brilliant futureuh-oh has a brilliant futureuh-oh has a brilliant futureuh-oh has a brilliant futureuh-oh has a brilliant futureuh-oh has a brilliant futureuh-oh has a brilliant futureuh-oh has a brilliant futureuh-oh has a brilliant future
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Witty View Post
Yes.

Because what you said has no scientific basis, also there being no predetermined destiny means 'running your course' is null and void, cancer is no different than any disease, so by your reasoning we shouldn't even have hospitals at all, people with heart disease, liver disease, kidney disease, etc have all run their course if what you said is true.

Let's close all the hospitals, every sick person should be left to die, that will make things better.
we absolutely should not close all hospitals

if i break a bone i want a doctor to mend it. if i get cancer, thats a whole different beast. do you know what cancer is? its a mutation of cells, there is no cure. they can combat it, and some people recover, but EVERY SINGLE LIVING PERSON will die of cancer, if they dont die of something else first. its science bro. its your body failing. your genetics have run there course.

if you have a disease that is curable, hospitals should definately fix it. but if you got pancreatic cancer what is the point? if you got the money, and you wanna stretch another 8 months into your life, go ahead and drop the crazy money on treatment

but i dont want my government, using my tax money, to keep a person alive who has an uncureable disease. that is pure buffoonery and malarkey dog
uh-oh is offline   Reply With Quote