The difference between this piece and other pseudo psychological philosophical pieces is that this one doesn't have a preaching-form. It has a question form throughout. And that actually makes the reader feel relevant. As where other pieces tell you the right answer, in their form. Which is cool to mix up, but I feel as this embodies a piece that makes you think about what the writer is conveying in means to your own feelings/thoughts, rather than reading a piece that seems to be on par with an open mind but just tells you you're wrong because the certain individual writing it is above you.
|