View Single Post
Old 09-05-2013, 04:46 PM   #53
Frank Metts
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,621
Battle Record: 0-1



Rep Power: 2305789
Frank Metts has a brilliant futureFrank Metts has a brilliant futureFrank Metts has a brilliant futureFrank Metts has a brilliant futureFrank Metts has a brilliant futureFrank Metts has a brilliant futureFrank Metts has a brilliant futureFrank Metts has a brilliant futureFrank Metts has a brilliant futureFrank Metts has a brilliant futureFrank Metts has a brilliant future
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PancakeBrah View Post
top 20% not being 'good' because it equates to 63 million people is flawed logic.
Not when you factor in legit candidates homie

Out of the 63 million you claim to intellectually equal or greater then theirs prob less then 150 million real people to compare yourself too, unless you want to brag about being smarter then children the elderly people on welfare/food stamps and those in correctional facilities snd yes I know out of the demographics I just named their are some rarities that are very intelligent but for maths sake we will just assume their not

Your not stupid 20% is prob beneath you but its just the smugness that makes me want to point out its not very impressive

I can even get into the science of avg IQ by race and differing brain sizes by race and why falling into that 63 million barely makes you an above avg white male for your age scientifically which I'm guessing is in the 18-34 demographic

And I'm not knocking any race or making fun of govt assisted people I'm just referencing research I did for a psych class on a study that was conducted some years back
Frank Metts is offline   Reply With Quote