[Mike Wrecka]

ok good battle. I like what both of you did with the topic for sure.

cs- this verse flowed very well. it was basically an audio verse. could be very easily spitten on a track. and I like that. im big on that. but i think your vocab was lacking compared to your opponents. as far as the story goes, it was good. I liked it. oh and your use of multis was subtle but very effective. props for that. it wasn't in your face but it worked.

rawn- this was a very well structured verse with very good vocab. it had a layer of complexity in the rhyming that wasn't present in your opponents verse. the character portrayal was effective. you didn't so much tell a story as you told the back story of a character which worked for you imo.


this was a real close battle. two dope verses tbh. but I got more from rawns because of the structure complexity. they were equally entertaining so that is the deciding factor for me

vote - rawn