@
Gazette in defense of those who voted on ur battle (me being one) with the exception of pancakes capital comment (and he does the same sht about centered verses tbh) all the votes had valid reasoning. Anytime a voter puts enough time to read ur verse, identify and process it, and leave an in depth (not like a sentence) reply it's valid. Just bc u don't agree w it does not make it invalid as a vote, but may make it as invalid critique to the writer... But that is why multiple people vote..
And it's a vote between 2 ppl, while advice/critique is geared toward the individual.. All those votes Consisted of both critique and a vote.
. Making them more than valid... Moreover all the ppl who voted on that match are good writers, not just ppl who suck giving bs reasoning that they hold high bc they suck. U were actually kinda lucky w ur voting turn out, whether u appreciate it or not (n I'm not saying anyone in this league is in the latter of those situations either) @
Gazette