So... did jesus have to be circumcised?
 

By someone? That's a bit of a flaw by the great creator isn't it?
To make his son with a flaw, or maybe he was just born circumcised.

Yes, he was a Jewish male, he would have been circumcised.

Also, they don't get circumcised because they believe foreskin is a flaw.

Picard facepalm to thread.

Oh, would they have kept his foreskin as like something sacred, or just binned it?

I don't know, I wasn't there.

Yeah they eat them

There was a guy who believed the rings of Saturn were Jesus' foreskin.

I will propose to my future wife with my foreskin

The Vatican has his foreskin hidden in their library.

This literally made me laugh out loud with tears in my eyes. Good God.

He was supposedly king of the jews, if you believe in such a thing. So yes. Jews consider it to be hygenic to get circumsized. Its pretty much a must. Or at least it was. Not sure annymore though

Hygenic! So to the jews the foreskin is a flaw then

Exactly

And then I guess he was born without one, coz his dad wouldn't have made his son flawed right?

You say stupid things

Circumcision began as an 'outward sign of man's participation in Israel's covenant with God'

It is also like a rite of passage for jewish males, although people born without foreskin are seen as Holy men but Jesus was not one of them.

Jews also do not believe Jesus is God's son, and tbh they know best....they were there.

All men are born with foreskins
And Jesus was the King of the jews, Gods Son.
Born with a foreskin that was a flaw in his fathers workshop!