Does this article on whistleblowing make sense to you?
 

A

All I can think is
...flo-rida

it's fuckin ridiculous...that's what I make of it...still don't see how the espionage act makes it illegal to call on the nuremberg laws but smh either way...

Author was way too shitty of a writer for me to labor through it.

"Draconian"...

funny that that word was brought up on this article. That was/is gonna be the title of my next OM piece.

anyway, as far as this article goes, once again, just another example of the elites being up to their usual FUCKERY.

lol he won the Pulitzer prize, bra.

Wow, that's shocking. For that article? I found it pretty scatter brained and uncompelling. Though, the Pulitzer for journalism generally is not awarded for the best writer (see: Thomas Friedman).

^^

Yeah I looked that up right after I posted. I'll give that article a try, but as I said, Pulitzer for journalism typically doesn't celebrate good writing so much as good research.

That is true, and point taken. He makes good points though IMO. And he is a worthy adversary to the NDAA.

On a second read, it's just that first paragraph that's a little clunky, starts to smooth out and make much more sense as you go along. My impatience got the best of me! Carry on.

Status: Approved by a certified English teacher with textee credentials.
Quarantined: by Chyeahhh for legitimacy and rebellious spirit.
Verdict: carrying on.

Ah yes my colleagues and I have peer reviewed this article in question. We are at a point of debate concerning the accuracy of the claims. Paging Dr. Rawnowld Macdonyall for further insight in this area of his expertise. Also requesting the opinion of Dr. Namix, we require at least 3 consecutive 500 plus word posts regarding the philosophical and metaphysical duality of this article.

^lol is that you cake?

another article: http://www.gadflyonline.com/home/ind...histleblowers/
^Im bout to have some poetry published on this site, btw

the laughter invigorates me.

I thought this was about the NSA dude. They had a rally for Bradley Manning here last week in front of the base. It was pretty pathetic.

damn that avy looks familiar...

Mine? The Shining.

uh hun...

haha, its funny cuz its true -- even at my expense lol. Definitely ignore the art of brevity on my end far too often.



In my professional opinion:
- I am glad you brought up the duality of this, because it may be easy to overlook. Sometimes whistleblowers are trying to be altruistic, but the duality to consider is the fact that: the best way to undermine 'altruistic whistleblowers' is to allow information to be leaked DELIBERATELY at times --- ordo ab chao yo.

Flood society with half-truths so it is harder to discern what's legit and what isn't, who's altruistic and who's just playing into the design. Then use the fact that the information available to us is a bunch of half-truths, and give a 'name' to the releasers of the information and believers of the information which is derogatory, to discredit them both (whistleblowers and conspiracy theorists).


There is my somewhat briefer synopsis of how, yes even this, echos the dualistic principles of the universe which are well known by world leaders in order to manipulate and control the masses. :)



i still haven't read anything about this specifically, but someone called me yesterday to ask about it lol. I don't watch news - but i can say that tracking personal information and aggregating the data is nothing new - it's just more effective with our technological advancements. Whether it is good or bad depends who does what with it --- in my industry, you're going to get banner advertisements eitherway, we might as well make them a bit more relevant to you based on the sites you've been to and the demographic you are in based on all of your social network information we accumulate :)