Netcees

Netcees (http://netcees.org/index.php)
-   Discussion Board (http://netcees.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   doesn't surprise me, still fascinating as hell though (http://netcees.org/showthread.php?t=61721)

Chyeahhh!!! 03-26-2014 07:46 PM

doesn't surprise me, still fascinating as hell though
 
http://sprott.physics.wisc.edu/picko...-universe.html

uh-oh 03-26-2014 08:41 PM

word bro i've posted the pic itself before on here

but yo

you been watching cosmos? theres a few episodes out you should check it shits dope

Destroyer 03-26-2014 08:56 PM

how bout that plane tho?

uh-oh 03-26-2014 08:57 PM

did they find it yet?

Destroyer 03-26-2014 09:00 PM

they will.... in the ocean where it crashed

Vulgar 03-27-2014 12:31 AM

Amazing.

Just Write 03-27-2014 12:36 AM

Thats pretty dope

YDK 03-27-2014 12:45 AM

So earth an our entire galaxy is just a brain cell inside of some giants head?
Seems legit an explains a lot tbh

Badweather 03-27-2014 12:50 AM

maybe we live inside the mind of a giant creature

Destroyer 03-27-2014 12:53 AM

things in nature mirror other things in nature?
weird

Fig 03-27-2014 12:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Destroyer (Post 308221)
things in nature mirror other things in nature?
weird

Don't be so cynical

At the very least this is pretty cool

MonkTheOracle 03-27-2014 03:37 AM

we are one... one is all

YDK 03-27-2014 03:44 AM

I'm assuming faggots are the bad blood cells

Mael 03-27-2014 01:04 PM

As appealing as the comparisons are, they seem to suffer from acute Pareidolia in the sense that a hypothetical chair at the end of the universe isn't a chair in the sense that it is devoid of intended purpose. Although visually similar, the nature of the brain and that of the universe are completely indifferent and share dissimilar functions. Thus, design is merely a coincidence.

So it's not surprising seeing some of you suggest we exist in a giant brain belonging to some unbounded creature. Intuition often fails concerning nature.

Hush 03-27-2014 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mael (Post 308497)
As appealing as the comparisons are, they seem to suffer from acute Pareidolia in the sense that a hypothetical chair at the end of the universe isn't a chair in the sense that it is devoid of intended purpose. Although visually similar, the nature of the brain and that of the universe are completely indifferent and share dissimilar functions. Thus, design is merely a coincidence.

So it's not surprising seeing some of you suggest we exist in a giant brain belonging to some unbounded creature. Intuition often fails concerning nature.

Mind.Blown

billy12 03-28-2014 01:02 AM

lma0

So what are you telling us Chyeah?

That the universe is within our brains?

lma0 watafagg0t

r0flzzz

Fig 03-28-2014 01:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mael (Post 308497)
As appealing as the comparisons are, they seem to suffer from acute Pareidolia in the sense that a hypothetical chair at the end of the universe isn't a chair in the sense that it is devoid of intended purpose. Although visually similar, the nature of the brain and that of the universe are completely indifferent and share dissimilar functions. Thus, design is merely a coincidence.

So it's not surprising seeing some of you suggest we exist in a giant brain belonging to some unbounded creature. Intuition often fails concerning nature.

In this instance, I can agree with what you're saying.

However, some of our greatest moments of understanding nature were led by man's intuition.

And to make the claim that the brain and the universe share dissimilar functions, is to imply that we fully understand the function of either. Although, I think making a claim of proof based on aesthetic similarity is kinda stupid, we would be equally stupid to denounce all other seemingly radical implications.

This is however, the nature of our western scientific mind state.

YDK 03-28-2014 01:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fig (Post 309074)
In this instance, I can agree with what you're saying.

However, some of our greatest moments of understanding nature were led by man's intuition.

And to make the claim that the brain and the universe share dissimilar functions, is to imply that we fully understand the function of either. Although, I think making a claim of proof based on aesthetic similarity is kinda stupid, we would be equally stupid to denounce all other seemingly radical implications.

This is however, the nature of our western scientific mind state.

EAST SYYDDEEE

Fig 03-28-2014 02:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YDK (Post 309076)
EAST SYYDDEEE

I... I dunno...

YDK 03-28-2014 02:08 AM

you're not supposed to


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.