Netcees

Netcees (http://netcees.org/index.php)
-   Discussion Board (http://netcees.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   A Discussion archive/Hall of Fame (http://netcees.org/showthread.php?t=53948)

Certain 02-19-2014 01:15 AM

A Discussion archive/Hall of Fame
 
How would y'all feel about this?

If you like the idea, should we give accomplishments to the thread starters (in the same style of Open Mic Hall of Fame accomplishments)?

Should the focus be on individual great posts or on threads as a whole?

How should we decide what gets in?

Let's talk.

Split 02-19-2014 01:16 AM

namix won't like this, methinks

Certain 02-19-2014 01:16 AM

namix has signed on. The administrative team is on board but could use some feedback in execution.

Vulgar 02-19-2014 01:24 AM

There should definitely be a hidden forum where all the new member roasts are kept. 100+ posts and you can access it or something like that.

Fig 02-19-2014 01:25 AM

Don't give accomps to thread starters. Great threads are joint efforts.

Fig 02-19-2014 01:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vulgar (Post 278946)
There should definitely be a hidden forum where all the new member roasts are kept. 100+ posts and you can access it or something like that.

Yes

oats 02-19-2014 04:54 AM

like this idea, agree with both vulgar and fig

Objective 02-19-2014 05:26 AM

I definitely like the idea of this. However, I think classic threads etc. should be archived and perhaps closed after a certain ammount of time (read: inactivity) and put into for example; the 2014 folder. When the year is through an award thread like the one Bags made can be placed with links to several threads and whatnot which will be easy to find when we walk down memory lane.

Whoever wins different shit by member votes can be given whatever accomps etc?

I don't know, just an idea on how to organize it in a fair way everyone can agree with.

Sicc 02-19-2014 09:27 AM

Threads should be inducted as a whole. No accomplishments should be given thou. Fig is right, What makes a great thread is not the starter, but the conversations carried out WITH IN the thread is what makes is great.

Lars 02-19-2014 09:55 AM

for sure there should be them

if only for ease of use finding some

the search features only good if you know what you're looking for

Diode 02-19-2014 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Split Eight (Post 278934)
namix won't like this, methinks

meseeks?

http://img4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb2...._Meeseeks.png

Chyeahhh!!! 02-19-2014 10:03 AM

he speaks....
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Split Eight (Post 278934)
namix won't like this, methinks

Look at this swine. Demodded and still thinks his opinion matters. You would probably hold that.mans dick.when takes a puss and right an essay on different streams

Split 02-19-2014 10:07 AM

> thread asks for opinion
> how dare u give an opinion

You seem angry brah. still thirsty for rematch #34 with AK? have I been on your mind all night?

PancakeBrah 02-19-2014 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nOx (Post 279071)
Threads should be inducted as a whole. No accomplishments should be given thou. Fig is right, What makes a great thread is not the starter, but the conversations carried out WITH IN the thread is what makes is great.

Thread starter gets majority credit.

Diode 02-19-2014 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by El Pancake (Post 279108)
Thread starter gets majority credit.

Aero has a massive erection right now.

Way to go, Dancake.

Sicc 02-19-2014 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by El Pancake (Post 279108)
Thread starter gets majority credit.

That's dumb.


Because anyone can just start some stupid fucking topic, for an example. Fig starts some homo erotic topic. But turns in to some new guy, like myself posting in it. All of a sudden topic change, now all of you no life scum bags begin to roast poor little ol' new guy (Me). That roast becomes HOF material because of all the corny/lousy lame flame attempts. Why should "Fig" get all that glory? When the Thread only became HOF because of the corn ball faggot fucks roasting that poor new guy?

Elaborate...

uh-oh 02-19-2014 10:27 AM

i like this idea

but itd be alot of work for whoever is in charge of it

they'd have to archive all of my posts

Wise Wiggles 02-19-2014 10:31 AM

Most thread topics are gay as fuck.
And you all should deepthroat soldering irons for making most of them.
Ridiculous how easily you dips are entertained.

Diode 02-19-2014 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nOx (Post 279113)
That's dumb.


Because anyone can just start some stupid fucking topic, for an example. Fig starts some homo erotic topic. But turns in to some new guy, like myself posting in it. All of a sudden topic change, now all of you no life scum bags begin to roast poor little ol' new guy (Me). That roast becomes HOF material because of all the corny/lousy lame flame attempts. Why should "Fig" get all that glory? When the Thread only became HOF because of the corn ball faggot fucks roasting that poor new guy?

Elaborate...

@Fig this dude throwing shade at da young god

Fig 02-19-2014 10:34 AM

Nigga you know I'm tryna get my tan on n shit

I aint with the shade bullshit


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.