![]() |
Listen
The writing is awful here. I had to dumb my shit down to a level that made me so uncomfortable. Read a verse anywhere in this league... It inspires nothing.
I miss upn. Carry on faggots |
You mean people don’t stroke ya ego..
Ok so you’re ok art this text stuff... blue could beat you any given day I could minus alcohol...Zuch could beat you any given Sunday... and I’m sure man other people I don’t know of. Take your basketball tuck ya dick between your legs and waddle home like a bitch. No one kissing your ass here. |
But that sounds like a cop out on your part I know i could meek a majority of these niggas including you but fact is I drink too much..
I remember you from b-boys dial up AOL 28k Bronx gateway 2000 computer shit. Assuming you’re tre...but you sound like a dickheae right now making excuses |
"my site where mans post whack text rhymes is better than yours"
& imagine having so little artistic integrity that you adjust how you write depending on the website buster shit |
In mathematics there's something called propositional logic. It's basically a structured way of looking at the validity of an argument.
The idea is to have two propositions, p and q. For example we could say p - It has rained recently q - the grass is wet What we want to prove is that IF it has rained recently, then that means without a doubt, the grass will be wet. That's the only way P implies Q can be proven as an argument. Let us look at all the possibilities of P and Q: It has rained recently and the grass is wet It has rained recently and the grass is not wet It has not rained recently and the grass is wet It has not rained recently and the grass is not wet If it has rained recently and the grass is wet, that's ok for our argument. This is P implies Q. It shows that our argument holds If it has rained recently and the grass is not wet this debunks the argument This is P implies not Q and shows the argument does not hold. If it has not rained recently and the grass is wet. This is ok for our argument This is not P implies Q. This one may be a bit more confusing, but in mathematics this is said to be "vacuously" true. It doesn't prove or disprove the argument, because the grass could be wet for a number of other reasons. Maybe someone turned on some sprinklers. It doesn't disprove the argument that rain will cause the grass to be wet. Don't worry if that doesn't make sense, it's not super relevant here. If It has not rained recently and the grass is not wet this is also ok for our argument This is not P implies not Q which is still consistent with our argument, because if the grass is dry and it hasn't rained recently, there's no reason to think the ground won't eventually become wet once it rains When you say "I had to dumb my shit down" what you seem to be implying is that dumbing down will make you successful on this site. This uses the same P implies Q logic that we've just talked about P - I dumbed down my writing style Q - I will be successful on this site Per your own admission of "dumbing down", this means what you've experienced sinced you've gotten here is a P implies not Q. You're saying that you have dumbed down your style, therefore P is true, but we all know you've not been successful on this site, which means we have not Q. That's part of why you're, understandably, frustrated. You've been struggling to establish yourself as anything other than a mid-tier writer at a time when only a handful of NC's top-tier writers are still active, AND at a time when a large portion of active voters are not even NC natives. If anything, this is the easiest time in NC history for you to come over and champ literally anything. This P implies Not Q is in fact, it's the only one of the above scenarios that debunks the argument entirely. So your insistence that dumbing down your style will make you successful on this site has been proven false so mathematically speaking, you just need to write better |
saying he had to dumb down his shit - does not imply he was successful at all.
it implies he felt that was necessary to compete. nothing else. your discernment is weak. |
Quote:
Your first sentence doesn't even form a coherent thought. Your second sentence makes even less sense.. You often compete with a goal of what? being unsuccessful? Go back to your weird antivax conspiracy website, adults are speaking. |
Quote:
|
Frac dumbing his down for you clowns.
|
oh, is that what you’ve been doing?
|
Who cares?
No matter how good you are at “text battling” it’s a meaningless medium, there’s like 30 of us left doing this stupis shit at the most and you’re making excuses for losing. What’s the merit in winning ? It looks good on your fabricated record? Will you be remembered for any of this? In conclusion, text battling is retarded, we’re all losers for participating in it and we’re all going to die anyways with nothing to show for our puny existences because we wasted all our time on this website. (PS: Sorry been listening to too much Nirvana lately) |
Quote:
|
LOL Adverse couldn’t even beat me with less than 30 ppl competing
sad |
Stfu faggots
|
Quote:
Honestly @Answer you’re probably right Zoloft might help, but my main reason for writing that was just because I didn’t have a dog in this fight and wanted to say something |
hey frac, how is pulse doing?
|
Frac isnt shit, he’s slightlywitter than the average bear and saying slightly might be a stretch... you aren’t that good homie, and even if you were no one cares
|
Stfu ouch
|
Frac is right tho
All thas left is low tier discord rings Aim's sloppy 2nds Text is dead |
If discord was anything like AIM you’d be there with bells
That and editing votes is the only way you had a good record on NC1 |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:11 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.