Netcees

Netcees (http://netcees.org/index.php)
-   Discussion Board (http://netcees.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Passer Rating Flaws Vol. (http://netcees.org/showthread.php?t=139723)

DMS 02-27-2019 10:51 AM

Passer Rating Flaws Vol.
 
One of the biggest flaws in passer rating is that they value Touch% Over INT%, this means that you could take any stats and inflate the passer rating by lowering the attempts.


70/100, 1 TD 1 INT = ~80

7/10, 1 TD 1 INT= ~110

Why? Because TD% boosts passers rating more than high% lowers it.

So you could take any TD/INT and shrink the passes to get a better passer rating.

uh-oh 02-27-2019 12:02 PM

Word i agree it should almost be the opposite.

But all those stats are goofy anyways. The only stat that matters for qbs is w-l's

Edit- wait nah i didnt factor in the TD/int which is the whole point i was just looking at completion percentage. 70/100 is much more impressive than 7/10. But yea the tds factoring such a big part make sense tho.

DMS 02-27-2019 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uh-oh (Post 728428)
Word i agree it should almost be the opposite.

But all those stats are goofy anyways. The only stat that matters for qbs is w-l's

Edit- wait nah i didnt factor in the TD/int which is the whole point i was just looking at completion percentage. 70/100 is much more impressive than 7/10. But yea the tds factoring such a big part make sense tho.

I’d rather have a QB who takes 20 passes to throw a TD and 100 to throw a pick than one which takes 10 passes to throw a TD and 50 to throw a pick. Back in the 60s and 70s when this system was first made picks weren’t as much the QB’s fault and were less detrimental but now it’s a huge factor. You can throw 100 picks to 100 TDs and still have a good passer rating as long as your TD% is high enough. TD/INT isn’t valued enough in this case to me.

I think certain stats matter and W-L isn’t the best measure of talent. But we should use stats based off actions not outcomes, like Accuracy% (opposed to Comp%) and Turnover Worthy Pass% (as opposed to INT%).

Aaron Rodgers is a perfect example, his TOW% was 1.17 but his INT% was .3


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.