Quarter Finals: Chat and Prediction
 

All topics will be Martin Luther King Jr. Quotes



Pent uP vs. Cimmerian

Topic: "That old law about 'an eye for an eye' leaves everybody blind. The time is always right to do the right thing"

VividlyVague vs. Mr. J

Topic: "If a man has not discovered something he will die for, he isn't fit to live"

Pinot Grij vs. Pie

Topic: "Everything that we see is a shadow cast by that which we do not see"

Diode vs. Razah

Topic: "Faith is taking the first step even when you don't see the whole staircase"



Before everyone starts asking for a mag already. Let us recall that in the closing of last round mag I said this one would take me longer because I've been out of town. Usually I'm already finished, I haven't started yet.

Interesting matchups. Weird bracket. Let me know if you want predictions or something else for the magazine, @Adonis.

That would be awesome

Whatever you'd like really. I'm working on it tonight so I'll be here. I feel like you catching the mag bug huh?

I have enough time to do predictions tomorrow, @Adonis.

PM it over whenever

Cimm vs pent will be dope

good stuff from u topical dudes, some of these pieces have been great

where's Baron's bum ass

He gotta live battle so he's been prepping for it. We committed to this tourney before he got the battle, I told him I'd make it work

@TYSON

I see you lurking, you broke my heart again bro


One of these days I'm going to motivate you two weeks in a row


one can hope anyways

This is a garbage rule that makes no sense unless you also plan to ban titles, unrhymed lead-ins, photos other than the topic and coded formatting. It also suggests that Pinot Grij did not win on his own merit when he absolutely did.

I'm doing predictions now.

Sounds good. Send it over

If someone posted a lead in they wrote it's their own words I would assume. You assume wrong in saying I'm suggesting he didn't win.

Someone should not be aloud to use someone else's work for there own benefit certain. I heard your opinion and you're entitled to it, but that's it.

Seriously though certain. Titles? Un rhymed lead ins?

These are not the same as someone taking a video they did not make and post it to help themselves.


Thank you for trying to start a revolt, you will not succeed

He used a video of a football play. It was like 45 seconds long. It was not a fictional work or anything more than the equivalent of describing a historic event before writing about it. That's been going on in topical battling for longer than you or Pinot Grij have been doing it. It's the equivalent of quoting a famous speech or poem as an introduction.

I'm not starting a revolt. I'm helping you write a magazine. But that rule is garbage.

I also don't see a problem with it, sometimes it can be pretty cool, like Certain said it isn't really any different than quoting someone else in a piece, which is done regularly, it's not like it's an unfair advantage if anyone can do it, should they so choose.

If voters personally don't like it, that's a risk the writer takes, I see no reason to ban it.

And multiple people said they didn't watch Pinot Grij's video, then voted for him anyway.

Yea I be lurking tho lol. Trying to get some type of drive to write bro. Shit just don't feel the same.

First of all, very sorry about the size, I'm not the most computer savvy at all. But @Certain and a few others have brought up how weird the draws and bracket has been, thought I would post this.

@Adonis, here it is:

http://i.imgur.com/QrrnNPB.jpg

Doesn't really explain how Pent uP got the No. 17 seed, but it does clear up other confusions.

He was an alternate

him and Pie actually

I just filled that out now, but I kept track of the seeds through out.

@Certain @Adonis @Witty

Friends. I wasn't trying to rock the boat, although that is my mandate. I try to bend expectations with my verses as you all know. My idea this past week was based on a very specific sporting event that sports enthusiasts like myself would remember, but I didn't want to sell short the general reading public. I didn't include the video link as a performance advantage, but as a supplement to my verse for people that didn't see the original play, as it was the springboard for my narrative.

My emphasis is and always will be in storytelling. My concept was to tell the story of a person on the wrong end of the stick and for sports fans, an iconic victim in the sports world. I greatly resent the people who assumed I was trying to gain a competitive advantage when really I was just trying to set the tone for a story that was really endearing to me.