Netcees

Netcees (http://netcees.org/index.php)
-   Discussion Board (http://netcees.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Opponent needed for Innovator: who wants a poetry battle? (http://netcees.org/showthread.php?t=120090)

Vulgar 08-04-2015 02:01 PM

Opponent needed for Innovator: who wants a poetry battle?
 
k

Destroyer 08-04-2015 02:01 PM

fuck it, I'll do it

Orc 08-04-2015 02:02 PM

i'll do it

edit: nvm too slow

Destroyer 08-04-2015 02:02 PM

let Orc have it

sral 08-04-2015 02:24 PM

fuck

Vulgar 08-04-2015 02:26 PM

@Destroyer vs. @Orc

@sraL vs. Inno

How's that sound, gangstas?

Destroyer 08-04-2015 02:26 PM

works for me

Orc 08-04-2015 02:28 PM

i was just helping out man im good

Destroyer 08-04-2015 02:29 PM

afraid to lose to me twice in one year?

sral 08-04-2015 02:40 PM

lmao I don't really wanna fuck my battle record up doing something I've never took part in and have no idea what I'm doing tbh

maybe throw me in as Clutbuck if needed and I'll write something?

Inno 08-04-2015 02:45 PM

Dam this almost was epic lol.

Come on guys one week wont hurt

Vulgar 08-04-2015 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sraL (Post 515796)
lmao I don't really wanna fuck my battle record up doing something I've never took part in and have no idea what I'm doing tbh

maybe throw me in as Clutbuck if needed and I'll write something?

I've actually decided that I don't think poetry battles should count for the overall site record here. I respect poetry and I respect the association/league, but it feels counterproductive to attach site records to it. There are league records, which is enough, IMO. I'd rather not convolute existing and future records with "wins and losses" for participating in a poetry competition. In my eyes, this discourages battlers who want to try out poetry, the consequence being a blemish to their honorable records.

@Innovator @Sharp What do you guys think of this assessment?

@sraL Also, try to bring @MMLP back into the fold, he's welcome to set up camp in the LGPA. :-)
)

sral 08-04-2015 03:01 PM

Destros got the Inno battle, no harm no foul

sral 08-04-2015 03:03 PM

I dunno if he'll be in the poetry ish, keep @ing him though and bring it to his attention. He might play. He only usually signs up to ish if I make him aware of it, he doesn't lurk here as often as me

The AOWL guys should def tag him though, his record doesn't do him justice and he's got record for showing to battles he's had

Split Eight 08-04-2015 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vulgar (Post 515812)
I've actually decided that I don't think poetry battles should count for the overall site record here. I respect poetry and I respect the association/league, but it feels counterproductive to attach site records to it. There are league records, which is enough, IMO. I'd rather not convolute existing and future records with "wins and losses" for participating in a poetry competition. In my eyes, this discourages battlers who want to try out poetry, the consequence being a blemish to their honorable records.

@Innovator @Sharp What do you guys think of this assessment?

@sraL Also, try to bring @MMLP back into the fold, he's welcome to set up camp in the LGPA. :-)
)

Wasn't tagged but

Maybe make Playoffs battles only count for site records?

Diode 08-04-2015 03:08 PM

is iambic pentameter a requirement

Destroyer 08-04-2015 03:18 PM

if these battles don't count towards our site record, then you can leave me in indefinitely

Inno 08-04-2015 03:22 PM

@Vulgar

Doesnt matter to me


Tbh i dont care for wins or losses. I just want to write and improve my craft.

Some one teach me how to edit, I obviously cant so it lol

sral 08-04-2015 03:26 PM

yeah I'll sign in if records are disabled

Diode 08-04-2015 03:27 PM

i'll poop in a bucket and sticky a thread about it if records are disabled

EGO.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.