Netcees

Netcees (http://netcees.org/index.php)
-   Discussion Board (http://netcees.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Anyone watching the world Cup final? (http://netcees.org/showthread.php?t=119394)

Sharp 07-05-2015 07:21 PM

Anyone watching the world Cup final?
 
This isn't even fun anymore

Useless 07-05-2015 07:23 PM

Bush just scored 3 goals. Almost gotta 4th

Sharp 07-05-2015 07:47 PM

You mean Lloyd?

Chill Phil 07-05-2015 08:00 PM

If we let these japs control the ball at their pace, the tide will change

uh-oh 07-05-2015 08:35 PM

im not watching it but i seen on twitter usa womens or some shit got 4 goals in like 15 minutes

after playing fifa for a total of 2 hours i still don't know how long a soccer match is tho so i can't equate it to a real sport i understand.

is it like flacco throwing for 5 td's in the first 15 minutes against the buccaneers last year?

FLACCO DA GOD

Witty 07-05-2015 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uh-oh (Post 500520)
im not watching it but i seen on twitter usa womens or some shit got 4 goals in like 15 minutes

after playing fifa for a total of 2 hours i still don't know how long a soccer match is tho so i can't equate it to a real sport i understand.

is it like flacco throwing for 5 td's in the first 15 minutes against the buccaneers last year?

FLACCO DA GOD

90 minutes.

Two halves of 45 minutes.

Sharp 07-05-2015 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uh-oh (Post 500520)
im not watching it but i seen on twitter usa womens or some shit got 4 goals in like 15 minutes

after playing fifa for a total of 2 hours i still don't know how long a soccer match is tho so i can't equate it to a real sport i understand.

is it like flacco throwing for 5 td's in the first 15 minutes against the buccaneers last year?

FLACCO DA GOD

yeah it was 4 with one player getting a hat trick in 16 minutes, which is 1/6th of the game. a hat trick is a big deal for anyone to get and to do it in that little time (especially that half-field shot) is incredible

but this is the world finals... bucs are like a third world country in a qualifier


http://vine.co/v/en7BtPZYW16

Witty 07-05-2015 09:14 PM

hat trick = 3 goals.

Useless 07-05-2015 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sharp (Post 500505)
You mean Lloyd?

I meant bitch. Fuck this phone.

Yo USA team got some fine ass women folk tho. That goalie could catch my balls in that ass....SNAP!

Objective 07-05-2015 11:34 PM

For those who didn't this was a pretty crazy goal: https://streamable.com/3kt8 Another angle: http://gfycat.com/ThirdFreeHeterodontosaurus

Congrats people! Guess you don't mind some throwback shit from 2011:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvGfV6qCiOI

Chill Phil 07-06-2015 03:48 AM

This is proof that Asian sports teams won't win any sort of competition that doesn't involve a cello.

Yoyoma to thread


(This is all in spite of the fluke that enabled Japan to be "returning champions" this year)

uh-oh 07-06-2015 05:52 AM

i think the thing with asians is they are too good at too many things. like not only are they great CELLO-ISTS but they can also play piano and guitar and can do calculus and make delicious general tso's chicken

if they didnt spread there talents around being amazing at everything they could be incredible at one thing.

LOOK AT THE SAMURAI

they didnt play pianos they just swung steel at eachother and held off the mongols with the help of godzilla

uh-oh 07-06-2015 05:55 AM

but word on topic

congrats to USA

this is more of a testament that if the american populace cared for soccer, and our best athletes played soccer we would dominate.

women in america have no respectable professional sport. no one watches womens basketball. no one watches golf, let alone womens golf. volleyball is like a sport pervs jerk off to.

but soccer gives the women the world stage, so our best women athletes can play soccer and devote themselves to it.

i sort of wish our best athletes would play it so we could show the world how much better slave genetics are then normal poor person genetics

sral 07-06-2015 06:40 AM

lmao the womens world cup doesnt count as the world cup final

thread title was misleading tbsexist

Witty 07-06-2015 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uh-oh (Post 500645)
but word on topic

congrats to USA

this is more of a testament that if the american populace cared for soccer, and our best athletes played soccer we would dominate.

women in america have no respectable professional sport. no one watches womens basketball. no one watches golf, let alone womens golf. volleyball is like a sport pervs jerk off to.

but soccer gives the women the world stage, so our best women athletes can play soccer and devote themselves to it.

i sort of wish our best athletes would play it so we could show the world how much better slave genetics are then normal poor person genetics

It's touching in a way that you think 'slave genetics' do not exist outside America.

The Irish are FULL of thum thar jeans....if such a thing exists.

I agree tho, if America invested in football and took a real interest in it, they would do very well and be a top nation, I don't think they'd *dominate* but they'd be a top team for sure.

Objective 07-06-2015 01:12 PM

Lars has a point, people in general care just as much about the WWC as the US does to WNBA. That said tho'; the goals were fucking brilliant regardless of gender, holy fuck. I also like to see the US be excited for something that has to do with football for once as it may grow their interest in the sport.

uh-oh 07-06-2015 05:37 PM

witty are you referencing ancient slavery like roman times or the more recent 16-1700s?

in ancient times everyone was enslaved by someone. there werent as big of a slave trade as far as breeding went at least as most of the best slaves physically were given the worst jobs. like in the mines and shit. the slaves which were purposefully breed FOR THE MOST part in ancient times were bred for beauty. eye and hair color. shit like that. personal house slaves. im sure they bred physical specimens for field work but slaves could free themselves and it wasnt as much of a generational systematic thing. it was too easy to just get new slaves from newly conquered provinces

but as for the more recent irish slaves sold to the americas

they were worth 1/10 of a black dude. they were disposable. to get more money they would breed them with black dudes to have mulatto kids to sell for higher prices

the climate and work favored the dark skinned and strong specimens. they were systematically bred based on stature and health. got good teeth broad shoulders big hands? breed him with this giant black woman.

centuries of systematic breeding led to african americans who barely resemble their african counterparts. skinny. some tall. but all slender and shit.

slave breeding in the americas made it possible for lebron james to exist. ray lewis. mike tyson. muhammad ali. michael jordan. lawrence taylor. the list goes on.

the greatest athletes ever.

Ghost1 07-06-2015 08:38 PM

Lmaooo

uh-oh 07-06-2015 09:02 PM

lol my phone typing skills leave much to be desired.

but the main point still stands.

african americans were systematically bred to be the physical specimens we see today. jimmy the greek was right. but they fired him cuz you can't speak the truth.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WzB7IsmOegE


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.