| UnbornBuddha |
07-01-2015 01:02 AM |
Sin is a tool to control mankind, but it's also liberating in a way; it all depends on the context. So while, it has its validity, it can easily be twisted to make mankind appear as always on the verge of corruption and therefore destruction. Mayhem is just a spectrum of the greater whole, besides to believe that divinity itself isn't sullied with sin will offset the connection of the heavens to this material plane. The pure and the turbid and their total separation is a fallacy not supported by the universe. Although, that's not entirely true either, but neither is it false. The coming, going, and transformation of things is a physical law, and to say that sin is a constant means that it is outside of physical laws. It is a heavenly law, but in heaven the duality of good and evil are not synonymous with it. If it were, that would mean that it (heaven) is connected to the material plane, and, therefore, subject to the laws of purity and turbidity constantly energetically transforming from one state to the next. To say that there is that which exists without sin is to say there is that which is outside the constant, and if it is then it must be sinless, but we already established that sin can only be a continuity if it existed outside of us, and so sin is just a spectrum not a constant because if it were nothing could escape it, not even those in heaven, where eternity is deemed to be.
Some say the difference is that God or whatever other theological foothold one needs to reconcile their life, and purpose is that one (the deity) transcends sin while another loses oneself to it. But, perhaps its the opposite, depending on the parties involved.
Also, the question is rhetorical, and, therefore, is not expected to elicit conversation, but rather brims with highfalutin agenda.
|
