Aye Veritas
 

Professional question

Is there a name officially for someone that uses the mindset of “there isn’t a way to prove my point right, but for the same reason you can’t prove your point right, so I am right” in almost everything they argue?

Not in regards to anyone here, someone I know personally lol

Basically two wrongs make me right lmao
@Diode has minored in almost everything so he might have some insight as well

And @Sharp has a degree ABOVE the line so also calling upon him

Trump Supporter.

He is

Well wasn’t but now “isn’t” still, just gets their side now. But not a supporter. Just like, a supporter of the same stuff.

He does it about non political shit too though

A strictly professional term, no, not to my knowledge.

Would be worth inventing one though.

You asked for the name, I gave you it LOL.

I wasn't asking whether or not he supported Trump, Knuck lol.

You see this phenomenon with the Creationsim vs evolution debates. Maybe the term in nestled in that literature?

Perhaps the law of non-contradiction? Although that it is more philosophical than psychological.

I.e how can we have essentially the same stance but you are wrong and I am right ? That is a contradiction and thus violates truth and reason?

Bro don’t start acting like you care about reason now

Don't "bro" me lowly. Don't start acting like you don't exercise faith.

fair?

You talking to me or Veritas with this?

I was talking to the guy above my post who’s last post ended with the word “reason,” Seth.

appeal to ignorance.

sociology 101. logical fallacies.

gracias

I chuckled at V not knowing this.

I am glad I was able to make you laugh man.

The law of non contradiction works too though. For the record.

Considering, both V and Des in here.

https://static.iris.net.co/semana/up...3/561361_1.jpg

Is this real?

It’s a real picture that I can see with my eyes

It looks like a real painting?

@Amen where u get that picture of me?

Meaning the imagine you silly faggots.

Please explain the image of Jesus versus the alleged whole “new face of Jesus” discovered.

Does look like you, tho lol.

Please first explain why you think it is appropriate to call people derogatory reamarks and then think that they would just wish to have serious conversation with you?

What do you need explained?
One is how uneducated white people see Jesus because of Renaissance paintings
One is how a man from that time period and region of the world would likely have looked
I’m of the opinion that were Jesus real, it wouldn’t fucking matter how he looked
But you know how I feel about that

I hate you faggots

Agree

You don’t think he existed or you don’t believe he was the son of god?

Because this is netcees?

fair?

Jesus was a nigger

Yo Dre I appreciate you bro

Never let them bring you down

The advice itt didn’t help he thinks it doesn’t apply because he’s right believe it or not

Technically? Yes

Yeah, thats fair. Ok, so where were we/?

Old image of Jesus verses the alleged new/discovered image of jesus.

Where did the old image come from?

And what are your thoughts on this new image?

Ah.

I do not know where old image came from. And I doubt that they can be 100 percent certain new pic is him.

I also know a great truth, that neither of those are how he looks.

So you are challenging modern day forensics?

Well....what procedure did they use?

Inb4shroudofturinmalarkey

Their common forensic procedures, I'm sure.

If Apple can make a phone that only opens for my face I think they can handle reconstruction of a skulls face

I mean maybe his beard was more or less glorious but otherwise that is the man JC

https://i.imgur.com/7YSMvan.jpg

Update I forgot to share here. How would you proceed, V?

I was very careful to develop a dialogue that made his own words damn him. For now I’m just purposely doing waited out responses reiterating things.