The basic logical truths being evidence of an all knowing being
 

Pls explain this argument someone, cuz some guys keep saying this and I don’t get it:

Restate your question more clearly please

Someone once argued, whilst debating if an omnipotent being existed, that for truth to exist there must be an all knowing being to be a standard. They did nothing to explain themselves so I’m a little confused.

Thread is 3/10

So Goedel’s incompleteness theorems?

Let's not do this.

I think I was pretty clear in the fact idk about this. You tell me.

God exists, period. I've had physical experiences that created a deep rooted faith I doubt will ever leave me. I've never read the bible, but I believe most of these universal questions... why are we here, who created us, what is our purpose...are not meant to be answered. Imagine a chicken living it's whole life knowing it's just going to end up decapitated, cooked, and sprinkled with salt and pepper to make it edible. I believe we are closer to that than we know.

People who try to interpret ancient text for grandiose answers to questions that aren't meant for answering is like a dog chasing it's tail.

God does exist
In the same way that Willy Wonka and Batman do

Your atheism is a religion. Your belief in Darwinian evolution is faith.

Atheism is not a religion
if you can’t understand simple shit like that, it’s no surprise we continue to stay at an impasse

You have beliefs. You believe there is no afterlife. You believe there is no God. That is a belief. You act in accordance with your beliefs. Sounds a lot like a religion.

Help me understand what I am missing here?

If someone came down from the sky and told me they were jesus and shit I’d probably believe them
The difference is one is the absence of a belief system and all of the others are belief systems
The absence of rain doesn’t mean it’s snowing, man. It just means it ain’t raining.

I don’t believe that there is no afterlife nor do I believe there is no god
I’ve never seen evidence compelling me to believe in either
My beliefs are open to change with compelling evidence to the contrary

Have you seen evidence that God does not exist?

Or stated otherwise, have you ever experienced something that you could not explain?

The first question shows your problem
Evidence of non-existence is a fallacy
You can’t prove the non-existence of anything
The onus is on you to prove existence

I knew you would say that and solid retort. Fair. My second post started me doing that. Please address it honestly sir.

Of course, I don’t know or understand everything, nor do I purport to