I know its been discussed
 

Are punches a factor in S&F

I was under the impression they aren't, and when I first came here I wasn't seeing them....Now I am tho

Just swag.


And flow.



Nahmean?

back int he old days a swag n flow verse was just a flex piece

adding punches to it makes it a reg battle becuase all verses should flow


me and lama had a 40 page arguement about this on the old nc where he was a fucking moron about the shit tbh

Call your opponent a faggot, reference either a samurai sword or the Art of War, rhyme a lot of syllables, use video game references or cartoon references or wrestling reference or ufc references, call yourself a funny variation of your name, and rhyme a lot of syllables.

YOU WIN!

Just wanna make sure everyone understands this tho...Because I will NOT be writing punches in my piece and aint trying to get 'deducted' for it ya know

I will not be referencing any of those tho...Proudly

SiK is DQ'd for pre-sway.

agreed

It's decided

If ur going to punch do so by complimenting urself

God of Meth I disown you

That would not be a punch Rawn


WOULD YOU FUCKING PUNCH YOURSELF RAWN?

U can inverse a punch sik

Huh?

lol'd

tbh I thought Geno was going to win your and his Topical match. I must adjust my bracket projections.



One second.







































































I still win my side of the bracket!

Lmao

Sig check.

Am I on your side?....That thing is like a giant fucking maze

If so im bringin the syrup

Since when is being clever not a good thing?

It's double elimination

Everyone is on everyone's side

You just blew my mind

We talkin' winner's bracket Meth.

That real shit.

Eveyone should have a Rawn Sig.....theres plenty of material out there

Lol.i was just going to say i gotta b setting a sig record as of late

In answer to the OP, yes, in my honest opinion.

Alright cool. Just dont vote on my shit

I not sure who it was but I had a battle with someone in BA (S&F) an was being voted against for not including punches.

I also had a battle before (S&F) where i got voted against FOR including punches...

So I too am interested in knowing what the final consensus is on that

man if oyur battle has punches its a regular battle, a topical match does not have punches because its a topical

swag verses is the new word for flex verses thats it


uf you have punches thats absurd and it isnt a swag and flow verse its a regular battle

Well thats what I said lol - Ill have to find the battle and call them to thread...

because you can't write punchlines?

Found it

lmao but swag is a flex battle

Whether or not it involves actual punches or not, if you just sit in your corner and flex without even mentioning your opponent indirectly, I will probably vote against you

You can mention your opponent and say you're better. But the focus is not creative punxhlines or dissing your opponent

i think the term "punchlines" gets lost on textcees who think by that they mean "insults about your opponent"

Punchlines do not necessarily mean insults about your opponent.

I beg to differ, you can incorporate punches or a diss into a snf if you do it with well....swag lol

"and yah moms? best nappy dug out ever, here's what I mean bitch
we time traveled and I bare backed her box on a negro league bench"

you pull shit off with finesse and the shit still fits

Yup!

fucka swag and flow title im captain freezy on a nanrdoweezy lmao andoleezy....fire...

ITS THE DASHING BOLD, HAHA HOLD MY LMAO'ING LOLED BALLAD POEM

lmao J METTS WITH THE WRITTEN, GAY T-REX WHEN IM SPITTIN

lmao!!! @Void @dull boy @Darth Yoda @Zombie @Neighbor @Beretta @Bags

Gay t rex