MORAL QUESTION FOR ALL OF MY ENLIGHTENED BROS
 

IF YOU HAD TO CHOOSE BETWEEN TRAFFICKING ONE OF THE FOLLOWING WHICH WOULD YOU CHOOSE AND WHY:

1. ENDANGERED SPECIES
2. HUMAN SLAVES
3. NUCLEAR WARHEADS/SUITCASE NUKES.

DEFEND YOUR STANCE.

Endangered species. It's so obvious. @Captain Obvious.

Next question.

Nuclear warheads because MutuallyAssuredDestruction

Yeah endangered species, not that I don't care about them but those other two options endanger my own species.

Human slaves so I can free them, world peace award, Schindler XIV

No one here is enlightened. You know this.

And if humans are the endangered species?

I am.

Apologize please.

That's probably a positive thing for the earth and most other species.

someone please shut this neckbeard faggot up.

u guys all stoop as fuk

id traffic human salves inside endangered species inside nuclear weapons...lmao u guys all idiyote

"oh i tex tbattla and topcal head between us we so smart!"

sike idiyotes. lmao so simple. like y chicken cross road? idk! cuz wan 2 duh lmao!

Well 2 is out of the question because the bible justifies the use of human slaves and since the bible is perfect who am I to argue

So it's gotta be between 1 and 3. I would argue that god created man with the knowledge and ability to create nuclear weapons and since religion is the major cause of pretty much every war ever I would say 3 is ok.

Plus animals only become extinct because god wants them to. So if god wants them dead so do I.



What do I win?

But your last argument was based on the fact that the other options endangered your species

yeah cuz it's my species.

I said it would be better for other species but I don't want it to happen because I am human.

That would not be a good day for me, but it would be for a lot of other species.

He gets the medal. Well done. Rep.

Next question....

would you eat another person to survive?

Depends on who I'm trafficking to, what the endanger species is, who the person is, etc.


I would not eat another person tbh. As a younger oatmeal, I would have said fuck yeah gimme some human. But now, unless I was a person of significant social utility, I would not eat another person to survive. The caveat being, if I was in that situation the primal instinct to survive could very well override my principles.

Trafficking in it own right is not something I would do at all no matter what it is. Would I eat another person to survive? No

LMAO CONFIRMED WHITEKNIGHTING FAGGOT CONFIRMED

i would like to set your testicles on fire and then put them out with blood hemorrhaging from your freshly disemboweled small intestine.

i would then cook them in a bowl baked from the flesh of your colon and rectum.

no anesthesia.

LMAO YO ANASTHESIA THAT CANADIAN BITCH WITH THEM BIG OLETITTIES?

http://trialx.com/curetalk/wp-conten...nastacia-1.jpg

I'D FUCK THOSE MELANOMA COVERED CANCER RIDDEN BITCHES WITHOUT A SECONDS THOUGHT OFF GP