Netcees

Netcees (http://netcees.org/index.php)
-   Discussion Board (http://netcees.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   So i guess women are gonna have to register (http://netcees.org/showthread.php?t=122736)

uh-oh 02-02-2016 08:16 PM

So i guess women are gonna have to register
 
For selective service/the draft soon?

America has gone full retard

Ghost1 02-02-2016 08:19 PM

Lol we haven't had a draft in like 50 years. Govt just trolling feminist bitches who be on fb an twitter too much.

YDK 02-02-2016 08:19 PM

Watchu talm bout

Ghost1 02-02-2016 08:20 PM

READ WTF IT SAYS YDK U FUCKING MONGOLOID

uh-oh 02-02-2016 08:47 PM

I cant figure out how to link on my phone im too retarded. 99 percent of the time it just posts the main site link. In my browser now its netcees.org not netcees.org/rhrjudjrbdjfb or whatever. But you can google women/s3lective service or whatever

I guess women can be in combat now so theyre saying women can be drafted

Can we quit pretending women are equal?

Ghost1 02-02-2016 08:50 PM

Word I agree tho. This gimmicky shit could get America BODIED in a war. Again tho.........I doubt we will see another draft in our lifetime. It's purely for show imo.

MC Fussy 02-02-2016 10:59 PM

https://i.imgur.com/OIXydFv.png

Objective 02-02-2016 11:28 PM

Actually, I don't impose this. (Big surprise) But I believe we do agree on a set number of things. (As usual/probably)

My main issue with women in combat is the implications they might face when it comes to front lines and so forth:
The physical and mental differences. (This can be battled by giving the exact same treatment and physical challenges men have, and not softing down on anything. It's crucial this is actually followed though. They need to make the same qualifications men have in both strength, endurance, mentality and so forth in the area they specialize in.)
Periods. No I'm dead serious about this. We can't have someone bleeding the fuck out or dealing with PMS on the battlefield. They need to be on the pill, that way they won't bleed out or deal with pregnancies should they feel like having sex with someone although that should be strongly prohibited since romance in the army can lead to fucked up favoritism and so forth. In combat not doing the logical thing to save the lives of many vs. the lives of a few is a dangerous thing. This relates to gay relationships as well, I don't say that gay people shouldn't be in the army but there should be repercussions if they take place. If you can't handle asexual relations with your co-soldiers then you're not fit to be there, romance should be left home.
All women platoons and so forth. (These are specialized for specific tasks that don't fit in or doesn't qualify for other places in the army.)

Why do I think women should be a part of the army? They can be a great asset for many reasons. The majority (if not all, there are rare exceptions) is wired differently than men, critical thinking and problem solving and differing views/ways of solving an issue can be helpful to bring new ideas to light. Most are lighter/tinier in build and can fit into areas many men can't. Women want equality, well you got it and when it comes to meeting the qualifications you sure as hell should meet them. It isn't a playground.

Plus, having more women signing up would also mean more soldiers and/or people with different skill sets and can fulfill other areas the army has to offer that doesn't include close combat or the frontline as well. Intelligence, bomb specialists, media, medics etc.

MC Fussy 02-02-2016 11:49 PM

asa nigga who's generation never been drafted to war & seen every war movie, imma tell u

first & foremost, mad women gonna get raped. that's some shit men don't sign up for.

aside from that, they can shoot and all that shit. as long as they pass the same physical req as the dudes do, i don't see the prob. aside from they gonna get raped/taken advantage of, that's for sure.

but maybe not. maybe if there's a shit ton of women then the sexual assault will go down & more will speak up. so whateva

uh-oh 02-03-2016 06:18 AM

Word. My problem is its COMBAT.im sure women can be just as good of a shot as men, but are they gonna be able to carry their 100lb pack or whatever? Move 20+miles in a day with it, carry out a 225 lb man on top of that who gets his leg blown off, etc.

Im not sure to what capacity women are already used. This just seems ridiculous to me. Im not against women in the military if they are behind a desk, if theyre a nurse/medic IN A BASE, but in the field seems ridiculous except in a worse case we're all gonna die and 80 percent of the male population is dead scenario lol

Witty 02-03-2016 07:04 AM

If they were unable to deal with all of the physical sides of the army they would not be in combat in the first place. They have to prove they can cope before they are allowed to fight. Same as men.

Chill Phil 02-03-2016 07:37 AM

Women can be deployed in combat, and are paid less for it. Hahahahahahahahaha

veritas 02-03-2016 08:30 AM

Facts are facts:

The AVERAGE man is 4x stronger than the AVERAGE woman. Now if you a dude with the body of Huth, you would get suplexed by a broad no doubt, but if you beast mode like myself, diode, or big Ant, then we gon piledriver hoes in the desert no doubt.

word/

~RustyGunZ~ 02-03-2016 10:49 AM

I'd handle you like the playground nerd James tbrr

And yeah we don't want ladies being emotional on the battlefield nor do we want them being raped so they'd need to be on that prescription that stops the periods and they need their vag sewed up

veritas 02-03-2016 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Knucklehead (Post 565219)
I'd handle you like the playground nerd James tbrr

And yeah we don't want ladies being emotional on the battlefield nor do we want them being raped so they'd need to be on that prescription that stops the periods and they need their vag sewed up

Why do you do this, Knuck? Why do you purposefully try and provoke me with dumb foolishness?

Must I even address this fallacious thinking? Would you like me to>? Or are you comfy with me just letting these words satisfy the delusional architecture your mind has built up about this?

~RustyGunZ~ 02-03-2016 11:09 AM

You're a little dude with a big beard

veritas 02-03-2016 11:11 AM

really? You sure?

tale of the tape: What is your height weight strenght etc?

~RustyGunZ~ 02-03-2016 11:14 AM

6'1 220lbs and I bench 325

Got a 2300PL

veritas 02-03-2016 11:20 AM

1. You fat
2. you bitch-made
3. you got no heart
4. you lying about your strength

I could go on... I mean put it to a vote. make a thread talking asking people if you and I were to engage in a death match, who would win?

LEt the consensus decide.

~RustyGunZ~ 02-03-2016 11:35 AM

Lol

~RustyGunZ~ 02-03-2016 11:37 AM

Meet me on the Ithaca Commons next Tuesday

Outside Moonshadows Tavern near where the acid trippin magician sets up shop

I'll lift your rejected soul out your body with an elbow to the throat

TYSON 02-03-2016 11:45 AM

Iffy subject

uh-oh 02-03-2016 12:02 PM

Im the same size as knuck except i can only bench like half that. Ive never been a weight room guy.

Just saying this to let you all know i would body all of you handily.

uh-oh 02-03-2016 12:10 PM

After a little googling 3 women in 2013 completed some basic marine training thing but were barred from serving because they couldnt pass some extra physica tests

In 2015 2 women made it to the end of some other training but failed during the physical endurance portion

So basically its to make women feel equal and crush there dreams when they realize its impossible for them to do what the average infantrymen can do.

So word bags is right its just some PR nonsense, and witty is correct as well if they cant do it, they cant do it. Theyre not making it like police and firefighters where women can pass with lowered standards

Diode 02-03-2016 12:37 PM

everybody has a plan until they get punched in the mouth

Dominate 02-03-2016 03:23 PM

I think everybody here basically agrees. Women shouldn't be barred from combat roles BECAUSE they are women, but standards shouldn't be lowered so they can get in. Combat units should be comprised of fitter than average men and the occasional buff af woman.

Dominate 02-03-2016 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uh-oh (Post 565236)
After a little googling 3 women in 2013 completed some basic marine training thing but were barred from serving because they couldnt pass some extra physica tests

In 2015 2 women made it to the end of some other training but failed during the physical endurance portion

So basically its to make women feel equal and crush there dreams when they realize its impossible for them to do what the average infantrymen can do.

So word bags is right its just some PR nonsense, and witty is correct as well if they cant do it, they cant do it. Theyre not making it like police and firefighters where women can pass with lowered standards


The first article that came up on my google search says 231 have already passed.

http://www.defense.gov/News-Article-...o-combat-roles

Also it does emphasize that standards won't be lowered to meet quotas. So I don't see a prob with this then.

Witty 02-03-2016 03:38 PM

I watched Ultimate Hell Week, a show where civilians go through the toughest parts of training from all the worlds best special forces and there was this one redhead chick who was thin, short, and looked pretty weak, but she was beasting that shit...and it was no joke either, I would have died. I dunno if she won cuz I didn't see the last episode, but I'm sure she was very close.

anime_boners 02-03-2016 04:11 PM

read thread title thinking you meant register here

came to post "fat chance"

thread was a let down

Geno 02-03-2016 04:51 PM

Just cause u big dont mean u got what it takes to do big things. Just cause u small dont mean you dont.

Im pretty average.but i got a switch that once it flips it aint no comming back from that

I like pussy. I dont object to it having a gun

Faggot Masa II 02-03-2016 06:28 PM

It's been shown that women can do well in combat (see kurdish women soldiers kicking ISIS' ass for more details). The problem lies within morale. Men will fight over women, that is fact unfortunately. Once you have a woman weaving her way through a platoon it is like a cancer. Same as any workplace really.

Chill Phil 02-03-2016 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Masa II (Post 565299)
It's been shown that women can do well in combat (see kurdish women soldiers kicking ISIS' ass for more details). The problem lies within morale. Men will fight over women, that is fact unfortunately. Once you have a woman weaving her way through a platoon it is like a cancer. Same as any workplace really.

This is the whole conflict with trying to integrate women into submarine duty.

I've seen it first hand. Niggas get EXTRA stupid when women were around. ESPECIALLY the senior enlisted dudes. Smh.

Dominate 02-04-2016 01:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Masa II (Post 565299)
It's been shown that women can do well in combat (see kurdish women soldiers kicking ISIS' ass for more details). The problem lies within morale. Men will fight over women, that is fact unfortunately. Once you have a woman weaving her way through a platoon it is like a cancer. Same as any workplace really.

I agree. Women should just stay out of the workplace. Men can't possibly be expected to behave like professionals around them.

Adonis 02-04-2016 10:56 PM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onNBxynagXE


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.