Netcees

Netcees (http://netcees.org/index.php)
-   Discussion Board (http://netcees.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   9/11 hoax (http://netcees.org/showthread.php?t=120886)

YDK 09-11-2015 03:27 PM

9/11 hoax
 
Just Google Tim osmon or world trade center hologram

It was all on purpose by the US

It's a shame so many innocent were murdered either way

Diode 09-11-2015 03:42 PM

kill yourself sometime, let me know how it goes hologram.

Ghost1 09-11-2015 03:47 PM

We already have a 9/11 thread. Smh.

I lold tho wen I seen it cuz I kno diode finger hovering over the ban hammer on ydk account hahaha

Destroyer 09-11-2015 03:48 PM

holograms and no plane theories is just ludicrous disinformation
building 7 is the key
no plane hit it
fell into its own footprint after 5 pm that day

Witty 09-11-2015 04:17 PM

There's really no way anyone can say with any degree of certainty that it was a hoax or an inside job. All I know that there are quite a few unanswered questions and things that don't make sense, especially when it comes to the buildings falling.

However to say it was not a terrorist attack and was a hoax or done by the US governement is simply fantasy with little to no evidence.

Witty 09-11-2015 04:26 PM

Molten aliminium is a good theory to explain the falling of the buildiings which doesn't require a conspiracy.

Inno 09-11-2015 04:56 PM

Just when i thought @YDK couldn't become more white trash

Low and behold you post this.

Instead of posting this trailer park news.

Go eat a dick and post in our battle nigga

Hush 09-11-2015 05:15 PM

negged

PancakeBrah 09-11-2015 05:18 PM

Legit lol'd

Tupacs hologram was involved as well, I heard.

Destroyer 09-11-2015 05:22 PM

nah but I heard tupac's hologram was supposed to be on one of the holograms of the planes but at the last minute, changed his ticket.

YDK 09-11-2015 05:37 PM

Can any of you tell me how the half the "hijackers" are still alive?
Have any of you worked at an airport...like I have...no the flash point of jet fuel or that it doesn't burn hot enough to melt metal?
Any if you care to explain the 500+ firefighter witnesses that describe explosions in the lobby of the towers before it ever collapsed or the explanation by the structural engineer of the wtcs that made them able to withstand a Boeing 707?

Please do a lil research before saying there's no evidence smh

Cheney was on board watch and called for the shooting down of flight 53 in PA yet there was no blood or bodies or even plane parts found in the MILES of wreckage thatwas supposedly the plane but your right im just an idiot.

84 out of 85 video tapes were confiscated by the FBI and they all admitted there was no second plane and there were spots missing in the footage.

Or can anybody explain how multiple newstations reported the collapse of tower 2 more than 20 mins before it ever collapsed?

What about the fact that Tim osmon aka Osama bin laden was a CIA trained agent for the US?

O wait and the owner of the wtcs who just happened to take out enormous insurance files on the wtcs a month before they were attacked, and he just happpeneeddd to include terrorism as the biggest paydays for the insurance quotes and then even sued the insurer for twice the money because there were two attacks.

Or why the government only funded 15 million into the investigation of 9/11 when bill Clinton had 60 million invested into him getting a blowjob?

Why didn't the secret service or the president react immediately when told of the attacks? He kept reading a book tens mins after the second plane had supposedly hit. Wouldn't they call for immediate protection of the president if they actually thought they were under attack?

There's a shit ton more evidence to dispute the government's claims of what happened on 9/11 than there are to prove it...but sure neg me for thinking you guys wanted to know the truth

YDK 09-11-2015 05:38 PM

Just read before responding

http://www.collective-evolution.com/...t-be-debunked/

PancakeBrah 09-11-2015 05:42 PM

Laughing.

Where does Slender Man fit into all of this?

YDK 09-11-2015 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dancake (Post 530762)
Laughing.

Where does Slender Man fit into all of this?

What's slender man?

I'm just posting evidence to negate what bush and Cheney claimed, if y'all don't wanna hear it or believe it thats cool, I just assumed somebody would actually find it interesting or fucked up

PancakeBrah 09-11-2015 05:45 PM

Slender Man was the pilot of the hologram tower

YDK 09-11-2015 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dancake (Post 530765)
Slender Man was the pilot of the hologram tower

Ahhhh lol

But yeah the whole hologram thing was all over YouTube, like the planes wing disappearing behind a building that was supposedly behind it an shit lol
Just weird stuff everywhere

serge T 09-11-2015 06:40 PM

http://www.popularmechanics.com/mili...-trade-center/

YDK 09-11-2015 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by serge T (Post 530789)

This is awesome thanks lol
I don't completely agree with either side but I am glad they both admit jet fuel isn't what melted the towers an shit

serge T 09-11-2015 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YDK (Post 530792)
This is awesome thanks lol
I don't completely agree with either side but I am glad they both admit jet fuel isn't what melted the towers an shit

It doesn't say that the beams were melted. They were weakened, and bent under kilotons of weight. If there was ever a 9/11 coverup, it was to hide how incompetent intelligence was.

uh-oh 09-11-2015 08:00 PM

lmao serge gets the rep for the sig

Pharaohs Army 09-11-2015 08:20 PM

writers

YDK 09-11-2015 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pharaohs Army (Post 530815)
I saw an entire documentary about that popular mechanics report.
Pretty much dispels a lot of myths. I'm not reading it at the moment; I forgot what it says about building 7 (which is indeed mysterious).. When I'm not so lazy I will see what popular mechanics or other sources say, about all the building 7 conspiracies.

But like, every other thing--

as serge said, the beams did not melt, but they became malleable enough to eventually fail.
in the doc they put jet fuel around one of these iron beams and, it doesn't fail right away, but after a certain amount of time in the extreme fire it becomes weak to failure.

the planes hit up high. once it starts collapsing it is basically in freefall. there is no such thing as "falling too fast", unless it's falling faster than gravity minus the friction, which is physically impossible and didn't happen.

the plane in PA hit the ground at such a speed and angle where things became disintegrated into smithereens.. this has been scientifically tested; it's not a mystery. Plane, luggage, bodies-- smithereens.


if this was all a huge conspiratorial inside job-- i think would have taking a LOT of people to know about it; and not not have ONE person, come forward with anything substantial, a leak, a bit of evidence.. is ridiculous
even the tiniest scandals break so fast in this country. there is no way.

The Bush admin. and Cheney were a disaster of an administration, war criminals too, and most definitely EXPLOITED 9/11 to invade Iraq... but that does Not mean 9/11 was an inside job.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence; and these conspiracies have 0 evidence other than conjecture..

The one thing I will grant is building 7 is a mysterious thing that should be looked into.
But again, unexplained things about building 7 does Not make every other crazy/debunked claim, true.

Word, probably the most agreeable thing ive read about any of this shit

serge T 09-11-2015 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pharaohs Army (Post 530815)
I saw an entire documentary about that popular mechanics report.
Pretty much dispels a lot of myths. I'm not reading it at the moment; I forgot what it says about building 7 (which is indeed mysterious).. When I'm not so lazy I will see what popular mechanics or other sources say, about all the building 7 conspiracies.

But like, every other thing--

as serge said, the beams did not melt, but they became malleable enough to eventually fail.
in the doc they put jet fuel around one of these iron beams and, it doesn't fail right away, but after a certain amount of time in the extreme fire it becomes weak to failure.

the planes hit up high. once it starts collapsing it is basically in freefall. there is no such thing as "falling too fast", unless it's falling faster than gravity minus the friction, which is physically impossible and didn't happen.

the plane in PA hit the ground at such a speed and angle where things became disintegrated into smithereens.. this has been scientifically tested; it's not a mystery. Plane, luggage, bodies-- smithereens.


if this was all a huge conspiratorial inside job-- i think would have taking a LOT of people to know about it; and not not have ONE person, come forward with anything substantial, a leak, a bit of evidence.. is ridiculous
even the tiniest scandals break so fast in this country. there is no way.

The Bush admin. and Cheney were a disaster of an administration, war criminals too, and most definitely EXPLOITED 9/11 to invade Iraq... but that does Not mean 9/11 was an inside job.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence; and these conspiracies have 0 evidence other than conjecture..

The one thing I will grant is building 7 is a mysterious thing that should be looked into.
But again, unexplained things about building 7 does Not make every other crazy/debunked claim, true.

Tower 7 was basically the result of tons of debris falling and a massive fire breaking out, combined with how the building itself was built.

Pharaohs Army 09-11-2015 10:56 PM

writers

serge T 09-11-2015 11:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pharaohs Army (Post 530878)
Thanks @YDK.
Yikes couple bad typos but you get the drift.. But it was mostly from the documentary I was just re-iterating
@serge T
Ok, but even a lot of debris, that's a pretty "new-looking" building. How freakin shoddy of an an engineering job is it that debris could cause the thing to collapse in such a manner?
Again, I will have to look more into it... but thanks for posting that Popular Mechanics.. it's all I could think about as I read the thread, and then you saved me the time of having to find it.

Tons upon tons upon tons of debris. The building caught fire while debris kept landing on it. This is why fires get put out in buildings lol. They collapse if you don't.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Afb7eUHr64U

Pharaohs Army 09-12-2015 01:01 AM

Yeah that building is "in trouble". Some video evidence of the fire. no one seems to talk about that vid first I've seen it.

Destroyer 09-12-2015 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pharaohs Army (Post 530903)
once it starts collapsing it is basically in freefall.

no.

freefall does not occur through the path of most resistance, unless ALL support beams were severed simultaneously.

Pharaohs Army 09-12-2015 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Destroyer (Post 530943)
no.

freefall does not occur through the path of most resistance, unless ALL support beams were severed simultaneously.

you're right.. My bad. Freefall did not happen right away... but it failed near the top, and accelerated towards free fall, until it hit it.
(towers)

building7
IMO, based on vids of the fire, and Eng's cool video clip loop, building 7 structure/supports seems to have "failed" more towards the middle of the building... and speeds up to freefall more quickly.

(i used the words "cool" and "speeds" loosely there,but u know what i mean)

serge T 09-12-2015 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pharaohs Army (Post 530903)
Yeah that building is "in trouble". Some video evidence of the fire. no one seems to talk about that vid first I've seen it.

Because it doesn't fit their narrative lol.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.