Netcees

Netcees (http://netcees.org/index.php)
-   Discussion Board (http://netcees.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Should They Drug Test Welfare Recipients? (http://netcees.org/showthread.php?t=9955)

Boredom 08-10-2013 12:53 PM

Should They Drug Test Welfare Recipients?
 
what's your thoughts on this..

i'm saying fuck yes, if i have to take a piss test to go to work.. fuckers should have to take a piss test to get free money.

Witty 08-10-2013 12:55 PM

I love that you guys have to take drug tests for work.

Lolololol

That must suck.

Strikta 08-10-2013 01:13 PM

I don't think it'd be a bad idea.

veritas 08-10-2013 01:21 PM

Sound theory.

oats 08-10-2013 02:10 PM

I think they should be. My tax money pays for the program, I don't want pay for other people's drugs when I got my own to buy. Union=no drug test for me.

Strikta 08-10-2013 02:15 PM

Got a feeling if they did this the rate of homeless ppl would go up drastically.

SiK 08-10-2013 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strikta (Post 116072)
Got a feeling if they did this the rate of homeless ppl would go up drastically.

Who cares. Let them die off

Objective 08-10-2013 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SiK (Post 116078)
Who cares. Let them die off

People like you is the reason I hate humanity.

SiK 08-10-2013 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Objective (Post 116083)
People like you is the reason I hate humanity.

People like you are the reason 8 yr olds still breastfeed

Loast 08-10-2013 03:05 PM

they should have stipulations... if it's too feed your family of young ones than no
if it's to feed just yourself because your not working than yes...

Objective 08-10-2013 03:06 PM

SiK: I'm fine with that tbh.

Certain 08-10-2013 03:06 PM

The taxpayer cost of drug testing that many people on a regular basis would be ridiculous, far exceeding the amount of money denied to the people who failed.

And the poor populations of Colorado and Washington would skyrocket because they have legalized marijuana. That would lead to a backlash against pro-marijuana legislation.

Rawn M.D. 08-10-2013 03:11 PM

I don't think marijuana is the drugs they talking on

but I agree w certain first point

good theory but bad in implementation

Xnub 08-10-2013 03:14 PM

Pots calling kettles black

oats 08-10-2013 03:52 PM

yeah Serpent brings up a good point, I'm really not too familiar with the economics of it all but it sounds pretty unfeasible in practice.

In theory, however, I think an appropriate caveat would be to have the option of welfare money for living expenses (EBT, food stamps, etc) if drug free, and if positive for hard drugs (class 1? I think, idk) then that money is used for rehab purposes.

it's a tough balance, sympathy for the individual but pragmatism for the nation as a whole.

Rawn M.D. 08-10-2013 04:04 PM

Sc 1 drugs have no medical application @oats

PancakeBrah 08-10-2013 04:06 PM

Hey Rawn shut the fuck up.

Rawn M.D. 08-10-2013 04:07 PM

Go play w ur diagonal rook cake

oats 08-10-2013 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rawn M.D. (Post 116125)
Sc 1 drugs have no medical application @oats

I legitimately have no idea what this means. I just know there are different drug classifications, with "street drugs" being considered the worst/most dangerous. Though as I recall, those classifications themselves were pretty awful.

Rawn M.D. 08-10-2013 04:22 PM

Ya they need to b revised tbh

I just read an article on cnn about how marijuana is improperly classed


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.